Skip to content

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Peer-reviewed Royal Society journal covering research at the interface of physical and life sciences, including modelling of biological and social systems.

Known aliases

  • J. R. Soc. Interface

Current stories

scienceOne report1 publisher

Bumblebees follow and face a swaying flower using the same motion cues in different ways

Wageningen and Delft researchers reproduced bumblebee landings on a flower model swaying twice a second with two control rules fed by the same cues. The pair gives engineers a control scheme to try on drones that must land on moving pads.

Publishers:phys.org

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+5
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence50
scienceOne report1 publisher

Thermal noise holds the pigeon's proposed ear compass to 0.15 bits per second

Daniel Kattnig modelled a semicircular canal under the conditions most favourable to electromagnetic induction and found the bird's own thermal fluctuations leave a directional signal far too slow to steer by.

Publishers:phys.org

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap0
Incentives30
Confidence58
scienceOne report1 publisher

Cuttlefish suckers gripped stiffer plates harder than softer ones in a Wageningen pull test

Wageningen biomechanists found microscopic pillars on the rim of a cuttlefish sucker, then measured how hard dissected arms clung to plates of varying roughness and stiffness in a water tank. Plate stiffness is what moved the reported forces.

Publishers:phys.org

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+30
Incentives60
Confidence50
scienceOne report1 publisher

Laser tracking catches a Medinilla anther tip swinging against its own stalk

Buzz-pollination biomechanics has mostly measured how hard a flower shakes. A Vienna group measured when each part of a stamen moves, and found the anther able to work against its own stalk.

Publishers:phys.org

Reality

Evidence63
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+14
Incentives52
Confidence58
scienceOne report1 publisher

Adding conformity to a Bayesian voting model makes near-unanimity outrank unanimity

Aurele Boussard's team at Toulouse-CNRS and Leeds asked when a group's confidence is evidence of its competence. Their answer turns on whether the members were also watching each other while they decided.

Publishers:phys.org

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+20
Incentives40
Confidence55