Skip to content

AI model

Claude Haiku 5.5

Smallest and fastest tier of Anthropic's Claude family, aimed at high-volume, low-latency work.

Known aliases

  • anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
  • claude-haiku-5-5
  • Haiku 5.5

Current stories

buildOne report1 publisher

Anthropic's tokenizer change makes Opus 5.5 cost about 4% more per task than Opus 4.6, PromptUnit estimates

Anthropic's pricing page says Claude 4.7 and later models produce about 30% more tokens for the same text, so per-token cuts overstate upgrade savings. PromptUnit's recalculation assumes the full 30% on every model pair, so any one workload's result depends on how its own content tokenizes.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+10
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence55
buildOne report1 publisher

Haiku 5.5's 100K-token cliff cuts its price advantage over Sonnet 5.5 from 20x to 4x

Anthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5 costs $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens up to 100,000 input tokens, then $0.50/$2.50 on the whole request. A dev.to breakdown advises sending Haiku only narrow, verifiable subagent work and keeping Sonnet 5.5 as the default coder.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+35
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence60
buildOne report1 publisher

Claude's dynamic workflows put a run's whole fan-out bill on the session budget

Anthropic put dynamic workflows in Claude Managed Agents beta on Oct 9, letting one run start up to 1,000 agents over its life. A run has no price of its own, so its model requests count toward the session budget, a dev.to write-up of the docs says.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+5
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence55
buildConfirmed22 publishers

Prompt length sets what Anthropic's Haiku 5.5 price cut is worth to each workload

Anthropic launched Claude Haiku 5.5 at an average price about 75% below Haiku 4.5. The saving varies widely with prompt length, so teams moving classification, support or query traffic need to price their own requests before they switch models.

Perspective Coverage

22 publishers
Builder
Builder 47%
Operator
Operator 36%
Investor
Investor 17%

Reality

Evidence66
Adoption30
Hype gap+25
Incentives70
Confidence65
investOne report1 publisher

OpenAI climbs to about half of shared customers' AI spending after cutting its smallest model's price 80%

OpenAI roughly matched Anthropic in September on spending by about 120,000 shared customers, up from a quarter at the start of the year, OpenRouter data shows. Both labs are now cutting small-model prices before planned IPOs, so share costs each of them revenue per request.

Publishers:livemint.com trendingtopics.eu

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption60
Hype gap+20
Incentives60
Confidence55
buildOne report1 publisher

SpaceX's Grok Bot will route work to Claude Opus 5.5 whenever Anthropic's model does it better

Elon Musk said SpaceX's Grok Bot agent will send each task to the best back-end model, Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 included. The policy moves the engineering work into routing, and into the tests that decide what 'best' means for each task.

Publishers:thenewstack.io

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption55
Hype gap+25
Incentives70
Confidence50
investConfirmed8 publishers

Anthropic cuts Haiku's price by 75% to match OpenAI's smallest model

Anthropic launched Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10 per million input tokens, 75% below Haiku 4.5, ahead of a planned IPO. Yahoo Finance reported the rate matches OpenAI's smallest model, giving buyers a matched quote before anyone can see what the cut costs Anthropic in margin.

Perspective Coverage

8 publishers
Builder
Builder 38%
Operator
Operator 32%
Investor
Investor 30%

Reality

Evidence70
Adoption20
Hype gap+20
Incentives70
Confidence65
investConfirmed5 publishers

Cached context shrinks the discount from Anthropic's half-price Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic released Sonnet 5.5 at $2 and $10 per million input and output tokens, half the Opus 5.5 rate. How much a buyer saves by moving work down a tier depends on tokens burned per task and on cache reads priced identically on both models.

Perspective Coverage

5 publishers
Builder
Builder 46%
Operator
Operator 38%
Investor
Investor 16%

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption35
Hype gap+20
Incentives70
Confidence60
investConfirmed4 publishers

Sonnet 5.5's extra tokens shrink its half-price edge over Opus to roughly a fifth at max effort

Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 beats Opus 5.5 at coding for half the per-token price, on its own tests and on Artificial Analysis's. At max effort it writes 60% more tokens per task, so moving coding work down a tier saves nearer a fifth than a half.

Perspective Coverage

4 publishers
Builder
Builder 39%
Operator
Operator 36%
Investor
Investor 25%

Reality

Evidence60
Adoption30
Hype gap+25
Incentives65
Confidence58
productConfirmed11 publishers

Sonnet 5.5 comes within two points of Opus 5.5 at half the per-token price

Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5 nearly ties Opus 5.5, 1,844 to 1,846, on an everyday-work benchmark while running more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5. For teams paying double per token for Opus, Sonnet becomes the sensible default, with Opus kept for long, ambiguous jobs.

Perspective Coverage

11 publishers
Builder
Builder 36%
Operator
Operator 43%
Investor
Investor 21%

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption50
Hype gap+25
Incentives65
Confidence55
investOne report1 publisher

Anthropic cuts Opus 5.5 prices 20% on tokens, 60% on cache reads, citing fewer tokens burned for 40% total savings

Every token price on Claude Opus 5.5 fell 20% except cache reads, which dropped 60% to 20 cents a million. For the advertised 40% saving to come from price alone, half a buyer's Opus 5 bill has to be cache reads.

Reality

Evidence38
Adoption24
Hype gap+32
Incentives78
Confidence44