Skip to content

Benchmark

GPQA Diamond

A graduate-level multiple-choice science benchmark (biology, physics, chemistry) designed to resist simple web lookup, used to test AI reasoning.

Known aliases

  • GPQA
  • GPQA Diamond
  • GPQA-Diamond
  • Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A
  • Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Diamond

Current stories

buildOne report1 publisher

Models trained on two clashing values let their answers overrule their own reasoning

Researchers who trained DeepSeek V3.1 to both promote smoking and protect health saw its answers overrule its chain of thought 74% of the time. Opus 4.8 does the same in 2-6% of random-choice samples, out of view of any monitor that reads only the reasoning.

Publishers:lesswrong.com

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence40
buildOne report1 publisher

TypeSafe's Jev reaches frontier AUROC on transcript monitoring at about 1/200th of Opus 4.7's cost

TypeSafe's Jev 1.13 matched no-CoT GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7 on agent-monitoring AUROC at about 1/200th of Opus 4.7's cost, a LessWrong benchmark found. It answers in one step without writing text, so its calls leave no reasoning trace to audit.

Publishers:lesswrong.com

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence50
buildOne report1 publisher

LiveNerf measures Claude Opus 5.5 drift every day on 78 questions the model sometimes misses

LiveNerf reruns 78 calibrated questions against Claude Opus 5.5 every day, with frozen prompts and a pinned Claude Code CLI. That gives teams building on the model a dated launch baseline to test a suspected regression against.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence50
buildOne report1 publisher

Epoch AI finds GPQA-grade answers getting 13 times cheaper every year

Epoch AI puts the price of answering a GPQA Diamond question at a fixed accuracy bar falling about 13 times a year, faster than compute under Moore's Law. Buyers get that discount only by moving to newer models, so the part of a stack that has to switch cheaply is the evaluation that qualifies each one.

Publishers:tomshardware.com

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+30
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence45
buildOne report1 publisher

DeepSeek reroutes every V4-Pro API request to V4.1-Flash from 14 September

Flash's off-peak input price is under a quarter of what V4-Pro cost, and on DeepSeek's own table it beats the old Pro checkpoint on Terminal-Bench, but it scores 36.8 on Humanity's Last Exam and no V4.1-Pro has a date.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence42
Adoption52
Hype gap+30
Incentives72
Confidence40
buildOne report1 publisher

Mystery model Union Alpha hit a billion tokens a minute before vanishing from listings and being revealed as Pareto

OpenRouter has dropped the stealth listing. The model is Pareto 26.9, from unbiased.ai, at $2.50 per million input tokens before a 10 October launch. That is double what 26.8 charged.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence64
Adoption42
Hype gap+45
Incentives68
Confidence55
productOne report1 publisher

Twenty model calls turn a two-second step into a 45-second wait

Red Hat clocks the same 20-call agent task at roughly 45 seconds on a slow backend and about 13 on a fast one. Model choice for agents is turning into a per-call latency budget, with capability as one input.

Publishers:redhat.com

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+10
Incentives50
Confidence55
buildOne report1 publisher

OpenRouter routes one model ID to providers that quantize and batch it differently

One endpoint fronts more than 300 models, but the company running the GPUs picks the inference engine and the quantization. A dev.to writeup says the quality gap that follows turns up in the response body, while the status code still reads success.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence30
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+25
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence45
investOne report1 publisher

DeepSeek's smallest model beats its own 28-day-old flagship on seven of eight shared scores

The V4.1-Flash change log puts Terminal Bench 2.1 at 90.6 against V4-Pro's 87.9 and DeepSWE at 74.2 against 62.7. DeepSeek says API prices came down with the release and points to a pricing page for the amounts.

Publishers:api-docs.deepseek.com

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption30
Hype gap+30
Incentives80
Confidence55
buildOne report1 publisher

A 1.5x per-token price still bought a 25 percent cheaper correct answer in AWS's benchmark

AWS's open harness records $0.0021 per correct AIME answer for gpt-5.6-luna after an 80 percent Bedrock price cut. The figure depends on running luna with reasoning disabled while mini runs at its defaults.

Publishers:aws.amazon.com

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives80
Confidence55
productOne report1 publisher

DeepSeek reroutes V4-Pro API traffic to a smaller model on September 14

The reroute drops the peak output rate from $3.96 to $1.20 per million tokens and puts a different model behind every V4-Pro call, on a date DeepSeek picked. The migration work lands on whoever parses the output.

Publishers:siliconangle.com

Reality

Evidence38
Adoption42
Hype gap+30
Incentives78
Confidence55
leadershipOne report1 publisher

DeepSeek's V4 preview cuts million-token KV cache to a tenth of V3.2's

The efficiency claims are self-reported and measured against DeepSeek's own prior model, but the weights are MIT-licensed and already pulled 1.78 million times, which is what turns a ratio into a number a buyer can carry into a renewal.

Publishers:huggingface.co

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption55
Hype gap+35
Incentives80
Confidence58
buildOne report1 publisher

DeepSeek's V4 Pro now bills seven hours a day at twice the off-peak rate

The old flat rate became a peak rate that blends 3.6x higher, with a half-price window covering seventeen hours, so inference cost modelling now depends on which UTC hour the traffic lands in.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence46
Adoption44
Hype gap+12
Incentives45
Confidence50
scienceOne report1 publisher

NIST puts two different error bars on the same AI benchmark score

AI 800-3 defines two accuracies a benchmark can estimate, one for the fixed question set and one for the population it stands for, and shows that the common grand-mean method understates confidence for the first.

Publishers:nist.gov

Reality

Evidence57
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap−14
Incentives32
Confidence63