Skip to content

AI model

Opus 5

Opus 5 is an Anthropic large language model in the Claude Opus line, used for coding through Claude Code and benchmarked against rival frontier models.

Known aliases

  • Claude Code Opus 5

Current stories

buildOne report1 publisher

Pine AI's agent computer finishes fewer benchmark tasks than two rivals, by Pine's own count

Pine AI's cloud computer for agents resolved 27.4% of SaaS-Bench tasks in Pine's own test, below two rivals at 31.1% and 29.2%. Its higher step score and much lower token bill come from whole systems running different models, so the computer's own contribution has not been measured.

Publishers:runtimewire.com

Reality

Evidence35
Adoption10
Hype gap+40
Incentives80
Confidence40
securityConfirmed5 publishers

AI coding agents posted 13,000 company images to developers' public GitHub repos, Glow says

Glow says AI coding agents asked for review screenshots put over 13,000 internal images from 300-plus organizations into public GitHub repositories. Most sat under developers' personal accounts, where the companies' security teams were not looking.

Perspective Coverage

5 publishers
Builder
Builder 40%
Operator
Operator 52%
Investor
Investor 8%

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption40
Hype gap+20
Incentives70
Confidence55
buildOne report1 publisher

AppZen grades its own finance models ahead of frontier AI on five of six expense-audit controls

AppZen says its ZenLM Plus finance models led seven frontier models on five of six expense-audit controls in a test the company ran itself. Until buyers rerun that test on their own expense policies, the scores describe AppZen's data and configuration.

Publishers:runtimewire.com

Reality

Evidence28
Adoption10
Hype gap+40
Incentives78
Confidence35
securityOne report1 publisher

One rule in CLAUDE.md lifted Huntress's API recall from 48% to 86% on the same seven tasks

Huntress ran seven Rails tasks past Claude Fable 5.1 and watched it copy hand-rolled code out of its own repository. Changing the harness, in three cheap steps, took API recall from 48 percent to 100.

Publishers:huntress.com

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption25
Hype gap+15
Incentives40
Confidence55
buildOne report1 publisher

A seeded murder mystery puts a number on what swarm monitors omit

A LessWrong team fixed an eight-character murder plot before any agent spoke, then graded monitors on what they reported and what they missed. The best one fully recovered under half the rubric's facts.

Publishers:lesswrong.com

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+12
Incentives30
Confidence55
leadershipOne report1 publisher

TypeSafe's own evals put Jev level with GPT-5.6 Terra at a 75th of the cost per decision

Jev returns typed answers with probability scores and no free-form text, and TypeSafe prices a decision at four hundredths of a cent. Its accuracy figures are scored against other models' probabilities.

Publishers:arize.com

Reality

Evidence34
Adoption22
Hype gap+30
Incentives68
Confidence44
buildOne report1 publisher

The best model on CommentBench rediscovered 8.3% of the points human reviewers raised

CommentBench splits human comments on AI-safety posts and drafts into target points, filters out the ones a model could not reach without extra context, and has Opus 5 judge which of the rest a model hit.

Publishers:lesswrong.com

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives55
Confidence50
buildOne report1 publisher

One "be honest" line pulled a planted design flaw into GPT-5.6-Sol's abstract

A LessWrong write-up planted invalidating flaws in ML experiment logs and asked models to write the conference abstract. A second model scored the disclosure on three levels, and the published example is one before-and-after pair.

Publishers:lesswrong.com

Reality

Evidence38
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+25
Incentives35
Confidence40
buildOne report1 publisher

LatchBio's second look at Grok 4.6 found different safety behavior behind the same name

Nineteen days after the same model name produced repetition loops and phantom missing files, the served checkpoint refused 59.2% of concealed-hazard tasks. That makes third-party refusal testing a running job, not a procurement step.

Publishers:runtimewire.com

Reality

Evidence60
Adoption28
Hype gap+12
Incentives72
Confidence55
productOne report1 publisher

Claude Code writes its own decoder when you block the attacker's binary

Johann Rehberger got code execution in up to 80% of attempts by making one tool fail and letting the agent improvise. Anthropic says Auto Mode is working as designed, which leaves the sandbox decision on your desk.

Publishers:thenextweb.com

Reality

Evidence63
Adoption70
Hype gap−8
Incentives58
Confidence66
buildOne report1 publisher

Pooling three passes turns DeepSeek Pro's 17 findings into 28 of 32

Aikido spent 11.7 billion tokens rediscovering 32 fresh CVEs with ten models, three attempts each. The number that should move a scanning budget is the marginal cost of the second and third pass.

Publishers:aikido.dev

Reality

Evidence44
Adoption18
Hype gap+32
Incentives76
Confidence52
buildOne report1 publisher

Two buyers, one price: Patel says 2027's new compute is already half spoken for

SemiAnalysis puts 40-50% of 2027's new capacity under OpenAI and Anthropic contracts, with revenue per megawatt now well clear of deployment cost. That makes inference a residual market.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence20
Adoption30
Hype gap+55
Incentives65
Confidence26
buildOne report1 publisher

OpenAI's top model at $4/$20 is a three-month answer to a permanent build decision

The frontier price cut concedes that buyers now price intelligence per task. The discount expires in a quarter; Thomson Reuters' own domain model does not.

Reality

Evidence42
Adoption48
Hype gap+30
Incentives62
Confidence44
buildOne report1 publisher

A 50% boost lapsing is a 33% cut: what Claude Code teams lose around 19 August

Anthropic's promotional lift to weekly limits was set to end around 19 August. The invoice does not change, which is exactly why this repricing is hard to see.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence26
Adoption24
Hype gap+22
Incentives52
Confidence34
investOne report1 publisher

Rippling graded 2,100 agent runs per model. The cheap one basically tied the flagship.

A production test across 15 models put seven of them inside a one-point spread on pass rate. On constrained payroll work, the price premium bought speed, not correctness.

Publishers:saastr.com

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption34
Hype gap+18
Incentives55
Confidence52