Skip to content

AI model

Qwen3.5-9B

Open-weight language model with about 9 billion parameters from Alibaba's Qwen3.5 family, small enough to run on local hardware.

Known aliases

  • Qwen 3.5 9B
  • Qwen3.5 9B
  • qwen3.5-9b
  • qwen3.5:9b

Current stories

leadershipConfirmed10 publishers

GLM-5.2 completed a full replication chain on eight $55 TV boxes in four of five Anthropic runs

Anthropic researchers had GLM-5.2 complete a full replication chain on all eight $55 TV-box test nodes in four of five runs. They say no current model is both small and capable enough to spread in the wild, and that gap could close by the end of 2026 at the current pace.

Perspective Coverage

11 publishers
Builder
Builder 34%
Operator
Operator 45%
Investor
Investor 21%

Reality

Evidence66
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+32
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence72
productConfirmed5 publishers

Anthropic runs a 26B model across 15 $55 Android TV boxes to test the AI worm threat

Anthropic ran Gemma4-26B-A4B across 15 off-brand Android TV boxes at about $55 each to test whether an AI worm could host itself on IoT gear. Its researchers theorize a working worm could follow by year end. Unmanaged devices need an owner now.

Perspective Coverage

5 publishers
Builder
Builder 34%
Operator
Operator 45%
Investor
Investor 21%

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+35
Incentives50
Confidence60
buildOne report1 publisher

Coinbase trained its 9B fraud reviewer on a reward computed from known labels, with no judge model

Coinbase says a Qwen3.5-9B model post-trained for under $100 beat Claude Opus 4.5 on its Onramp fraud benchmark. The figures are Coinbase's on private data; the reusable parts are the label-based reward and the tier-only, block-only harness.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+25
Incentives55
Confidence55
buildConfirmed7 publishers

Microsoft's Decision-1 turns the check before an agent acts into a scored Foundry call

Microsoft has put Decision-1, a model that scores fixed choices, in Foundry at $0.042 per million input tokens. Agent teams now have to test whether its scores, so far benchmarked only by Microsoft, are calibrated well enough to decide when a case goes to a human.

Perspective Coverage

7 publishers
Builder
Builder 42%
Operator
Operator 28%
Investor
Investor 30%

Reality

Evidence38
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+30
Incentives65
Confidence62
buildOne report1 publisher

Self-edited context lifts Qwen3.5-9B from 28.8% to 42.5% on BrowseComp-Plus

Meta, MIT and University of Washington researchers let models rewrite their own context, lifting a trained 9B model from 28.8% to 42.5% on BrowseComp-Plus. The gains come from specified benchmark tasks, and rewriting earlier context invalidates the model cache, so we would keep hand-built compaction pipelines as the production default.

Publishers:infoq.com

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+20
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence40
investOne report1 publisher

Newer AI models caught less fraud in Coinbase's replay of 16,140 real transactions

Coinbase replayed 16,140 real transactions and found each newer version of three AI model families caught less fraud than the one it would replace. The result undercuts the idea that a model upgrade is a free improvement for a working fraud screener.

Publishers:cryptoslate.com

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption40
Hype gap+15
Incentives50
Confidence50
investOne report1 publisher

Microsoft claims its Decision-1 scoring model answers 35 times faster than GPT-6 Sol

Microsoft released Decision-1, a model that scores fixed answer options and, by its own benchmarks, runs 35 times faster than GPT-6 Sol. Whether routing work moves off general-purpose models now depends on independent tests and on pricing that confirm those self-reported figures.

Reality

Evidence30
Adoption15
Hype gap+35
Incentives65
Confidence35
scienceOne report1 publisher

Microsoft's Agent Lightning trains AI agents inside the harness they ship with

Microsoft Research Asia open-sourced Agent Lightning v1.0, a 3,500-line framework whose recipe lifted a 9B model's SWE-bench Verified score by 14.6 points. It runs reinforcement learning on the agent a team already deploys, sitting as a proxy between that agent and its model.

Publishers:microsoft.com

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives60
Confidence40
buildOne report1 publisher

UW and Meta's Context Language Models beat Codex-style summarisation by six points on BrowseComp-Plus

UW and Meta researchers report 59.4% on BrowseComp-Plus for a model that edits its own context, against 53.4% for Codex-style summarisation. The edited file is thrown away when the task ends, so memory that lasts across tasks is still the builder's job.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence42
Adoption8
Hype gap+12
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence45
buildOne report1 publisher

Ollama's new endpoint puts typed routing and moderation decisions on the local machine

Ollama 0.35 adds a /v1/systemone endpoint returning a choice, yes/no or score from models run on the device. Its 9B Nimble model matched human moderation labels 70.3% of the time in its maker's test, so each team still sets its own review threshold.

Publishers:runtimewire.com

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+20
Incentives60
Confidence45
buildOne report1 publisher

Probes on a 27B open model match direct probes of a 397B model on deception

Probes on Qwen3.5-27B reading other models' text came within 0.004 AUROC, on average, of probing authors up to 397B directly, a LessWrong post reports. Every tested pair was open-weight, so auditors who apply the method to closed models get the reader's view of the text and cannot measure that gap.

Publishers:lesswrong.com

Reality

Evidence35
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+20
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence30
buildOne report1 publisher

Qwen3.5-9B's 262K context window would consume the whole 8GB budget in KV cache

A dev.to guide to running local models on 8GB prices the KV cache between 15KB and 160KB per token depending on architecture. At 32K tokens held, that spread is the difference between 0.5GB and 5GB of a fixed budget.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence22
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+45
Incentives62
Confidence58
productOne report1 publisher

Harvey post-trained a 27B open-weight model into the frontier band on its own legal benchmark

The band it joined is one where the best closed models still finish under 10% of tasks end to end at roughly $50 and 20 minutes each, so what post-training buys a law firm is price and hosting rather than capability.

Publishers:harvey.ai

Reality

Evidence41
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+32
Incentives76
Confidence46
buildOne report1 publisher

A small harness carried a local model through the regression check in 2.1 minutes

A June finding said local models cannot iterate on code. It said so about chat UIs, and it named the fix. July supplied that fix and measured it. The follow-up test result is the number worth reading.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence46
Adoption12
Hype gap+12
Incentives32
Confidence44
buildOne report1 publisher

Agent Lightning v1.0 hands the RL loop to the harness, and the trainer gets text, not tokens

Microsoft reports Qwen3.5-9B going from 41.8% to 56.4% on SWE-bench Verified using 6K examples. The load-bearing change is who owns the agent loop, and what the service boundary costs.

Publishers:thenewstack.io

Reality

Evidence32
Adoption18
Hype gap+28
Incentives66
Confidence44
buildOne report1 publisher

Same weights, 70 points apart: the ARC-AGI-3 table has stopped being procurement evidence

One model was verified at 30.16 in the official harness and reported at 100.00 in NVIDIA's. Microsoft's Agent Lightning now trains the harness into the weights.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence54
Adoption58
Hype gap+28
Incentives66
Confidence48
buildOne report1 publisher

A 170-goal agent field test costs $0.49. Proving it actually passed costs more.

PlannerCritic's sweeps are cheap enough to gate every release. The harder problem is telling a clean run from a rig that quietly counted nothing.

Publishers:dev.to

Reality

Evidence34
Adoption11
Hype gap+24
Incentives68
Confidence33