Baker lab's from-scratch zinc proteases cut their chosen target in 36% of 135 designs
David Baker's University of Washington group tested 135 AI-designed zinc proteases, and 36% cut their target peptides. Cysteine designs fared worse, with 13 of 69 cutting theirs, and both rates come from a bacterial screen.
The Scientist · Science desk
Figures for two designed protease types. Cysteine: 13 of 69 designs cut their target. Zinc: 36% of 135 designs tested cut their target.
| Figure | Value | Note | Claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cysteine designs cut target | 13 of 69 cut | 5 | |
| Zinc designs cut target | 36% | 6 | |
| Zinc designs tested | 135 designs | 4 |
What happened
- RFD2-MI, a version of RFdiffusion2, designed the protein backbones, and ProteinMPNN with EnhancedMPNN chose the amino acid sequences.
- The best zinc design sped peptide-bond hydrolysis more than 10^8-fold over the uncatalysed reaction, and four substitutions pushed that past 10^10-fold.
- One designed protease cut full-length TDP-43, and others cut fragments of amyloid-beta and serum amyloid A.
- AI-guided refinement also produced a cysteine protease that cut its target at precisely the intended site.
Why it matters
- What's now possible capability A protease built for a chosen sequence can act as a switch for other designed proteins: the abstract describes caged cytokines and receptor antagonists that the designed enzymes selectively activate.
- What it limits constraint Medical use is a distance off. The enzymes have not been in human trials, and the rate figures compare each design with the uncatalysed reaction, so they say little about how a design stacks up against a natural protease.
- What doesn't add up contradiction Phys.org puts the gain from refining the top zinc protease at 30 times, while the abstract states its four-substitution gain as floors over the uncatalysed reaction. As worded, the two cannot be compared.
Next story · Science · 7h ago
Spin-1 triangulene chains couple to a superconductor only when they hold an odd number of unitsConfirmed2 publishers
Phys.org frames the result as a leap past AI-generated protein shapes, because a protease has to recognize a chosen sequence and then cut it [12]. The authors place the advance somewhere narrower. "Our results show that de novo enzyme design has advanced well beyond model reactions on activated substrates," the team wrote [10]. The Nature abstract calls de novo design of enzymes that cleave amide bonds a major challenge [11], and the paper's reference list includes an earlier Nature paper titled "Computational design of metallohydrolases" [13]. In our view the new part is the pairing: a zinc active site built next to a binding pocket for a peptide substrate chosen in advance [14].
The zinc numbers come from the Nature abstract and the cysteine numbers from Phys.org's account of a second paper [16]. Of 69 cysteine candidates, 13 cut their targets [5], or 18.8% [23]. The zinc rate of 36% over 135 designs [6] works out to about 49 enzymes [25] and roughly twice the cysteine rate [26]. That makes 204 designs tested in all [24]. They came out of a pipeline that Phys.org says was repeated dozens of times for each protease type [15], with AlphaFold 3 predicting final shapes to check against the intended designs [3].
In the screen, bacteria made one long chain joining the candidate enzyme, its target sequence and a glowing marker protein, and a design counted as workable if it cut the target and released the marker [18]. That keeps enzyme and target in one molecule. The thing this doesn't tell you is how many of the hits would cut the same sequence on a separate molecule. The TDP-43 result comes closer to that test, and the abstract puts rate enhancements for the three disease proteins at up to 10^9-fold [7].
The data availability statement lists crystal structures deposited in the PDB under seven accession codes [17].
What to watch
- Hit rates for target sequences beyond TDP-43, amyloid-beta and serum amyloid A, ideally from groups outside Baker's lab.
- Tests of the designed proteases against free-standing target molecules, not only the single-chain fusion screen.
- Any step toward human trials; Phys.org reports that none of the enzymes has been tested in people.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence72
- Adoption
- Not scored
- Hype gap+15
- Incentives
- Not scored
- Confidence68
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
David Baker at the University of Washington and colleagues combined several AI tools to create both cysteine and zinc proteases from scratch.
- [2]
A version of RFdiffusion2 called RFD2-MI was used to design the 3D shape and core backbones of the proteins, and ProteinMPNN and EnhancedMPNN were applied to select the amino acid sequences.
- [3]
AlphaFold 3 was used to predict the final shape of the designed proteins and check how closely they matched the intended designs.
- [4]
The team tested 69 versions of the cysteine protease and 135 of the zinc protease.
- [5]
Out of the 69 cysteine protease candidates, 13 successfully cut their targets.
- [6]
Of 135 zinc protease designs tested, 36% catalyse cleavage of their cognate peptide substrates at the targeted scissile bond.
- [7]
The designed metalloproteases selectively cleave the human disease-associated proteins TDP-43, amyloid-beta and serum amyloid A, with rate enhancements of up to 10^9-fold (printed as '109-fold' in the page text).
- [8]
One AI-designed protease cut full-length TDP-43, a protein that builds up abnormally in ALS and some dementias; other customized versions cut targeted fragments of amyloid-beta and serum amyloid A.
- [9]
The enzymes have not yet been tested in human clinical trials.
- [10]
"Our results show that de novo enzyme design has advanced well beyond model reactions on activated substrates," the team wrote.
- [11]
The abstract says de novo design of enzymes that cleave amide bonds represents a major challenge.
- [12]
Phys.org says AI tools have already generated new protein shapes and structures, and that using AI to create functional proteases is a significant leap forward because the enzyme must both recognize a chosen protein sequence and cut it efficiently.
- [13]
The paper's reference list includes an earlier Nature paper, Kim, D. et al., 'Computational design of metallohydrolases', Nature 649, 246-253 (2026).
- [14]
The abstract describes using RFdiffusion methods to design proteins with water-activating zinc-based active sites adjacent to a peptide substrate binding pocket.
- [15]
The researchers repeated the design process dozens of times for both types of protease to find options that worked.
- [16]
The findings are detailed in two Nature papers: Anqi Chen et al., Computational design of metalloproteases, and Hojae Choi et al., De novo design of cysteine proteases.
- [17]
Crystal structures have been deposited in the PDB under accession codes 11CE, 11CM, 11CP, 11CR, 11CU, 11CY and 11DU.
- [18]
Bacteria produced a single long protein chain linking the candidate enzyme to its intended target sequence and a glowing marker protein; a design was deemed workable if it chopped the target sequence and set the marker free.
- [19]
The best zinc design accelerates peptide-bond hydrolysis by more than 10^8-fold relative to the uncatalysed reaction (printed as '108-fold' in the page text); four substitutions increase this acceleration to more than 10^10-fold by improving active-site preorganization.
- [20]
Using AI to refine the most promising options boosted the cutting speed of the top zinc protease by 30 times.
- [21]
The team also designed caged cytokines and receptor antagonists that are selectively activated by the designed proteases, enabling bioorthogonal control of cell state.
- [22]
The AI-guided refinement also led to the design of a cysteine protease that cut its target at precisely the intended site.
- [23]
13 of 69 cysteine candidates is about 18.8%.
- [24]
The two papers tested 204 designs in total.
- [25]
36% of 135 zinc designs is about 49 designs.
- [26]
The zinc hit rate is roughly twice the cysteine hit rate.
Sources
2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- nature.comComputational design of metalloproteases
1 article · October 13, 2026
- phys.orgAI designs working molecular scissors that recognize and cut selected protein targets
1 article · October 16, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- De novo protein design
- AI for Biology
- Enzyme Engineering