Skip to content

Leadership Reports disagree2 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

Meta Superintelligence Labs loses Tulloch eleven months after courting him twice

He refused a reported $1.5 billion package in August 2025, joined two months later for less, and held his exit until Muse shipped. Meta has promised a confidential version of that product before the end of 2026.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Andrew Tulloch is leaving Meta about eleven months after joining in October 2025, having waited for the company to launch its Muse agent before going, according to a person briefed on the matter.
  • Zuckerberg pursued him in August 2025 with a package reported at up to $1.5 billion over at least six years, which Meta spokesman Andy Stone called inaccurate and ridiculous; Tulloch turned it down and joined later for less.
  • He worked in TBD Lab, the frontier-research group under Alexandr Wang whose Muse Spark model family powers the agent Meta announced on Tuesday, September 8.
  • Ruoming Pang, hired from Apple in July 2025 on a package reported above $200 million, left Meta for OpenAI in February 2026 after roughly seven months.

Why it matters

  • What it limits constraint The confidentiality promise for Muse is a multi-quarter build, and the group that owns the model family behind it has been shedding senior people faster than a six-year vesting schedule assumes.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction Meta says the reported number is wrong and that any package depended on the share price; if that is the accurate description, the lab's retention tool was a bet on the stock rather than cash, which changes why it failed to hold anyone.
  • Who has to decide decision For anyone recruiting out of Meta Superintelligence Labs, price is no longer the obvious lever: the largest reported number in the market has already been tried and exits still came inside a year.
  • What it sets up precedent Holding a resignation until a launch turns ship dates into exit windows, which makes Meta's next milestone its next retention test.

Averaged across the at-least-six-year term, the top-end figure Meta disputes works out near $250 million a year [20]. Set that against the revenue side of the same building: at Muse's $100 Maximum tier, about 208,000 subscribers paying for a full year would gross roughly the same amount [16] [8]. The more useful part of Andy Stone's rebuttal is his second point, that any such compensation depended on the stock rising [5]. Read as a description of the instrument rather than a denial of it, that says the retention device was multi-year equity, and equity vesting over six years holds a person in proportion to how much they believe in the next six years of the share price. A number sized to win an August auction, when Zuckerberg approached more than a dozen of Thinking Machines Lab's roughly fifty staff [18], at least a quarter of the company [21], is not the same instrument as one that binds the following September.

The record supports a narrower claim than that money cannot hold researchers of this rank. The Semafor exclusive rests on one unnamed person briefed on the matter, Tulloch could not be reached, Meta has not commented, and no reason, destination, successor, or operational consequence has been reported [19]. When he left Thinking Machines Lab, its spokesperson said he had decided to pursue a different path for personal reasons [7], which is what companies say when they know and when they do not. The narrower claim survives, and it is awkward enough: the two most expensively recruited names in this record both left within twelve months of arriving [15].

One departure from a division this size would be easy to read as noise, and personal reasons could be exactly what they sound like on their own. At least eight people left less than two months after the superintelligence effort was announced, and Ethan Knight left TBD Lab within weeks of joining [10]; Yann LeCun went in November 2025 [13]; hiring across the division was paused in late August 2025 except for business-critical roles [12]. Without division headcount, the series has no denominator: there is no turnover rate here, and a lab hiring at speed loses people in absolute numbers however well it holds them.

Rishabh Agarwal's resignation note is the closest thing to a stated reason anywhere in the record: it was a tough decision not to continue, he wrote, "especially given the talent and compute density" [11]. What he names as the pull is colleagues and machines rather than pay, and he left regardless, which points at a decision variable the compensation committee does not set.

Meta bought speed, and the launch itself backs that up: the agent shipped with a dedicated cloud computer for each user and a Sentinel layer that requests approval before sensitive actions, sold in the United States on a free tier plus $20 and $100 monthly plans [8]. The same roadmap also carries a dated promise beyond that launch: a confidential version before the end of 2026, designed so that even Meta cannot reach into a user's workspace [9]. That is a multi-quarter engineering commitment resting on a group whose senior researchers have been leaving inside a year, in a division where hiring is still restricted [12]. Last August's choice was to win the auction; the choice due now is whether that 2026 date gets re-scoped or handed to people who did not build Muse Spark.

What to watch

  • Whether Meta names a successor in TBD Lab or reports any effect on Muse Spark development; the record currently has neither.
  • Whether the confidential version of Muse keeps its before-end-of-2026 date or quietly moves.
  • Where Tulloch lands: a rival frontier lab would test whether research control rather than pay drove the exit.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence64
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives50
Confidence62
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Andrew Tulloch is leaving Meta after waiting for the company to launch Muse, its new personal AI agent, according to a person briefed on the matter.

    Reported Supported Source: a person briefed on the matterView cited source
  2. [2]

    Tulloch's departure comes roughly eleven months after he joined Meta in October 2025.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    Tulloch joined Meta in October 2025; a person close to the deal put the accepted package below both the original offer and the reported figure.

    Reported Supported Source: a person close to the dealView cited source
  4. [4]

    Muse was announced Tuesday, September 8, runs on the Muse Spark model family developed under Wang, and can carry out tasks such as sending emails and booking travel, continuing to work after users close the app.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    Meta spokesman Andy Stone called the description of the offer "inaccurate and ridiculous", said any compensation package depended on the stock rising, and denied that Meta had tried to buy Thinking Machines Lab.

    Reported Supported Source: Meta spokesman Andy StoneView cited source
  6. [6]

    Tulloch worked in TBD Lab, the small frontier-research group within Meta Superintelligence Labs run by Alexandr Wang; the wider division was formed in 2025 and has lost researchers repeatedly.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    Thinking Machines Lab's spokesperson said: "Andrew has decided to pursue a different path for personal reasons."

    Reported Supported Source: Thinking Machines Lab spokespersonView cited source
  8. [8]

    At launch Muse is available only in the United States, with a free tier and monthly subscriptions of $20 for Power and $100 for Maximum; each user gets a dedicated cloud computer called Muse Secure VM, and a separate Sentinel control layer governs access to the internet and connected services, requesting approval for sensitive actions.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    Meta plans a confidential version of Muse before the end of 2026, designed to prevent even the company from accessing a user's workspace.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    By late August 2025 at least three researchers had resigned from the new superintelligence lab, including Rishabh Agarwal; a broader count found at least eight employees had left less than two months after the initiative was announced, and Ethan Knight left TBD Lab within weeks of joining.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    Agarwal wrote: "It was a tough decision not to continue with the new Superintelligence TBD lab, especially given the talent and compute density."

    Reported Supported Source: Rishabh AgarwalView cited source
  12. [12]

    Meta paused hiring across Meta Superintelligence Labs in late August 2025 except for business-critical roles.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  13. [13]

    Chief AI scientist Yann LeCun left Meta in November 2025.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    Ruoming Pang, recruited from Apple in July 2025 on a package reported above $200 million, left for OpenAI in February 2026 after roughly seven months.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  15. [15]

    The two most expensively recruited researchers in this record, Tulloch at about eleven months and Pang at roughly seven, both left within twelve months of arriving.

    Derived Supported
  16. [16]

    At Muse's $100 Maximum tier, about 208,000 subscribers paying for a full year would gross roughly $250 million.

    Derived Supported
  17. [17]

    Zuckerberg pursued Tulloch in August 2025 with an offer reported at as much as $1.5 billion over at least six years, contingent on top bonuses and extraordinary stock performance; Tulloch rejected it.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  18. [18]

    Tulloch co-founded Thinking Machines Lab with Mira Murati in February 2025; by August, Zuckerberg had made a disputed attempt to buy the startup for about $1 billion, and after Murati declined he approached more than a dozen of the startup's roughly 50 employees, including Tulloch.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  19. [19]

    Semafor's exclusive rests on one unnamed person briefed on the matter; Tulloch could not be reached, Meta has not commented on his departure, his reason for leaving and destination are unknown, and no successor has been named or operational consequence reported.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  20. [20]

    A package reported at as much as $1.5 billion over at least six years averages about $250 million a year.

    Derived Contested
  21. [21]

    More than a dozen approaches to a company of roughly 50 employees is at least a quarter of its staff.

    Derived Contested

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. businessinsider.com

    1 article · September 10, 2026

    Top AI researcher Andrew Tulloch ditches Meta to work on training and inference at Anthropic
  2. implicator.ai

    1 article · September 9, 2026

    Andrew Tulloch Leaves Meta After Muse Launch

Topics and entities

Topics