Skip to content

Product Reports disagree2 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

A $100 part, an unlocked hatch, 60 seconds: the 737's exposed surface is physical

Academic researchers hijacked the link between two Boeing 737 flight computers with a coin-sized board. The constraint was never budget or code. It was who can reach the nose bay.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Researchers at the University of California San Diego and Oberlin College built a small, coin-sized device that can take over communications between two key flight computers on Boeing 737 aircraft.
  • The prototype costs less than $100 to build and can be plugged into a maintenance port inside an electronics bay underneath the plane's nose.
  • The electronics bay can be accessed from the ground through an exterior hatch that is not locked and is routinely accessible to maintenance workers and other airport staff.
  • The researchers estimate that an attacker would only need 60 seconds to install the device.
  • The findings were presented in a paper at the USENIX Security Symposium in Baltimore this week.

Why it matters

Researchers at the University of California San Diego and Oberlin College built a coin-sized device that costs under $100 and can take over communications between two key flight computers on Boeing 737 aircraft, plugged into a maintenance port in the electronics bay under the nose [1][2]. That bay is reached from the ground through an exterior hatch that is not locked and is routinely accessible to maintenance workers and other airport staff, and the researchers estimate installation takes 60 seconds [23][3].

The paper, presented this week at the USENIX Security Symposium in Baltimore, lands against an industry habit: much of aviation cybersecurity attention goes to network-based threats, while this attack needs little time and little money [4][5]. The researchers wrote that their goal is to alert the aviation community to this class of risk so it can be mitigated "well before they become dangerous" [6].

What sits on the wire matters more than the wire. The device interposes between the Flight Management Computer, which manages the flight plan and supplies information used during takeoff, and the Multipurpose Control Display Unit that pilots use to control it [7]. That position lets it change a flight plan while suppressing the change on the pilot's display [8]. The described scenarios include the autopilot diverting the aircraft into another country's airspace or simply flying off course [9]. The researchers also demonstrated manipulation of weight, balance and outside air temperature values, the inputs that make a takeoff safe or unsafe [10]. The prototype is Wi-Fi enabled, which the researchers say could theoretically let it join the aircraft's in-flight Wi-Fi and be driven remotely over the internet [24].

The scale is not marginal. UC San Diego puts roughly 8,000 737s in service, and the type accounts for about 25 percent of Delta's fleet, 38 percent of American's, 53 percent of United's and the whole of Southwest's [11][12]. Across those four carriers the exposure runs from a quarter of the fleet to all of it [18]. The researchers frame the finding as pointing to a broader industry-wide risk rather than one manufacturer's defect [13].

The disclosure timeline is the part operators should read twice. The researchers first alerted Boeing in 2020 and kept working with the company for several years after, and they say they do not know whether Boeing has fixed the vulnerability [14][15]. Five-plus years of engagement have ended without confirmed remediation [20]. Boeing did not immediately respond to Gizmodo but told Wired it had reviewed the findings and considers existing safeguards sufficient, saying its technical experts are confident that "the layers of protection in place on the airplane, including within the system design and the operating environment, provide sufficient mitigation to significantly limit the feasibility and risk of real-world attacks" [19][21].

The researchers do not oversell it. They concede the attack would require significant planning and engineering expertise, and that an attentive pilot could recover from most of what they tested; all of the authors say they routinely fly on 737s and will continue to [16][17]. Their proposed fixes are unglamorous and cheap: tighter control over who can reach a parked aircraft, or filling the vulnerable port with epoxy, or removing it entirely [22].

Watch whether any airline or regulator treats ramp access as a security boundary rather than a logistics problem, and whether the epoxy fix shows up in a service bulletin. A remedy that costs a few dollars per airframe and never appears is the clearest signal of where this actually sits on the priority list.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+25
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence58
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Researchers at the University of California San Diego and Oberlin College built a small, coin-sized device that can take over communications between two key flight computers on Boeing 737 aircraft.

    Reported Supported Source: Gizmodo, reporting on a USENIX Security Symposium paperView cited source
  2. [2]

    The prototype costs less than $100 to build and can be plugged into a maintenance port inside an electronics bay underneath the plane's nose.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The researchers estimate that an attacker would only need 60 seconds to install the device.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    The findings were presented in a paper at the USENIX Security Symposium in Baltimore this week.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    While much of aviation cybersecurity focuses on network-based threats, the researchers showed that a physical attack on an airplane may require surprisingly little time or money.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    The researchers wrote: "Our goal with this research is to alert the aviation community to this class of risks, so they may be appropriately mitigated well before they become dangerous."

    Reported Supported Source: the researchers, in their USENIX paperView cited source
  7. [7]

    Once installed, the device can interfere with communications between the aircraft's Flight Management Computer, which manages its flight plan and provides important information used during takeoff, and the Multipurpose Control Display Unit that pilots use to control it.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  8. [8]

    The device can secretly change a plane's flight plan while preventing those changes from appearing on the pilot's display.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    The researchers described scenarios in which attackers could cause the autopilot to divert the aircraft into another country's airspace or send it off course.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    The researchers demonstrated that the device could manipulate information about the plane's weight, balance and outside temperature, making a takeoff unsafe.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    About 8,000 Boeing 737s are currently in service, according to UC San Diego.

    Reported Supported Source: UC San DiegoView cited source
  12. [12]

    The 737 makes up roughly 25% of Delta's fleet, 38% of American's, 53% of United's, and all of Southwest Airlines' fleet.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  13. [13]

    The researchers say their findings point to a broader cybersecurity risk across the aviation industry.

    Reported Supported Source: the researchersView cited source
  14. [14]

    The researchers first alerted Boeing to their findings in 2020 and continued working with the company over the next several years.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  15. [15]

    The researchers say they do not know whether Boeing has done anything to fix the vulnerability.

    Reported Supported Source: the researchersView cited source
  16. [16]

    The researchers acknowledge that an attack of this type would require significant planning and engineering expertise, and that an attentive pilot could recover from most of the attacks they tested.

    Reported Supported Source: the researchersView cited source
  17. [17]

    The researchers wrote that all of the paper's authors routinely travel on Boeing 737 aircraft and expect to continue doing so.

    Reported Supported Source: the researchers, in their USENIX paperView cited source
  18. [18]

    Across Delta, American, United and Southwest, 737 fleet share ranges from about 25% (the lowest, Delta) to 100% (the highest, Southwest).

    Derived Supported
  19. [19]

    Boeing did not immediately respond to Gizmodo's request for comment, but told Wired it had reviewed the researchers' findings and believes existing safeguards are enough to reduce any risks.

    Reported Supported Source: Gizmodo, citing Boeing's statement to WiredView cited source
  20. [20]

    The disclosure relationship began in 2020 and ran for several subsequent years without the researchers being able to confirm remediation.

    Derived Supported
  21. [21]

    Boeing told Wired: "Our technical experts are confident that the layers of protection in place on the airplane, including within the system design and the operating environment, provide sufficient mitigation to significantly limit the feasibility and risk of real-world attacks."

    Reported Supported Source: Boeing, in a statement to WiredView cited source
  22. [22]

    The researchers' proposed fixes include tighter security around who can access planes on the ground, or blocking the vulnerable port with epoxy or removing it altogether.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  23. [23]

    The electronics bay can be accessed from the ground through an exterior hatch that is not locked and is routinely accessible to maintenance workers and other airport staff.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  24. [24]

    The prototype is Wi-Fi enabled, which the researchers say could theoretically allow it to connect to the plane's in-flight Wi-Fi and be controlled remotely over the internet.

    Reported Insufficient Source: the researchersView cited source

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. gizmodo.com

    1 article · August 14, 2026

    Researchers Built a Coin-Sized Device That Can Hack a Boeing 737’s Electronics
  2. interestingengineering.com

    1 article · August 13, 2026

    Tiny device hacks Boeing 737 flight systems, alters routes in under 60 seconds

Topics and entities

Topics