Senators want every TikTok test that disabled a safety feature, not just the one that hit 15 million
Blackburn and Blumenthal set a 1 September deadline for 13 questions. The broadest one asks for every US algorithmic experiment where TikTok withheld a protection, and how many minors were caught in it.
The Product Desk
What happened
- Two US senators wrote to TikTok about an experiment that switched off a safety feature for roughly 15 million American users.
- The letter runs to four pages, sets out 13 questions, and gives the company until 1 September to reply.
- The senators call the decision to run the test "depraved".
- Republican Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Connecticut Democrat Richard Blumenthal sent the letter on Wednesday, Bloomberg reported; it is addressed to TikTok chief executive Shou Chew and to Adam Presser, who runs the company's US spinoff.
- Blackburn and Blumenthal co-authored the Kids Online Safety Act.
Why it matters
Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Connecticut's Richard Blumenthal have given TikTok until 1 September to answer 13 questions about an experiment that switched off a safety feature for roughly 15 million American users [1][2][4]. The question that matters most is not about that experiment: the pair asked for a list of every algorithmic experiment TikTok has run in the United States where it "withheld, disabled, delayed, or reduced a safety feature", the number of users caught in each one, and how many of those were minors [5].
The specific test came out of a confidential 2023 TikTok document, produced in litigation against the largest social media companies and placed under seal by a court, whose contents Bloomberg Businessweek reported on 4 August [7]. According to the document, TikTok disabled an algorithmic safeguard designed to break up echo chambers of harmful content for 10% of its US users, making them a control group of about 15 million people at the time [8]. The document describes the choice as "a delicate balance across safety and the ability to measure impact on DAU (daily active users) and core metrics" [11]. One user in that group was Chase Nasca, a 16-year-old from Bayport, New York, selected at random on 25 January 2022, who died by suicide within a month [9]. Of his account, the document says: "TikTok's filter bubble prevention strategies did not take effect on this user by design" [10].
The rest of the letter is personnel-level: the names of every employee who was told about the experiment, an explanation of why minors were allowed into it, when executives learned of it, and a complete, unredacted copy of the internal document [14]. That is discovery by letter. The blanket request is something else. It treats a holdback group as a reportable event, and it asks for it retrospectively, across an entire market, broken out by age.
That is a hard thing to answer honestly. If 10% of US users came to about 15 million, TikTok's US base at the time was on the order of 150 million [19]. Producing the list the senators want requires that someone, at the time, recorded which feature flags were safety flags, how long each holdback ran, and which cells contained under-18 accounts. Most experimentation platforms are built to measure lift, not to preserve that kind of audit trail. Any team running production tests on minors should read the demand as a description of the logging it will be asked for later.
The legislative hook is direct. Blackburn and Blumenthal co-authored the Kids Online Safety Act, which died in the House in 2024 and returned this session; the Senate Commerce Committee voted to advance the revived version on 5 August, the day after the Businessweek story ran [13][16]. The Senate text keeps a duty-of-care provision requiring reasonable care to prevent mental health harms to minors, including anxiety, depression and compulsive use, and Blackburn argues it would deter future experiments by forcing safety to be designed in from the start [17]. The House passed its own kids online safety package in June, by a different route [18]. The senators also argue timing aggravates the conduct: Congress had raised concerns about the algorithm pushing young users toward harmful content since October 2021, roughly three months before Nasca was randomised into the control group [15][20].
TikTok did not respond to a request for comment on the letter [12]. For the Businessweek investigation, a spokesperson said the company is "deeply committed to the safety and well-being of users", especially teenagers, added that "our hearts break for any family that experienced a tragic loss", and pointed to continued spending on Trust and Safety detection systems and enforcement teams [12].
Watch whether TikTok answers the full-list question or narrows its reply to the single 2023 test, whether the sealed document is unsealed, and whether the Senate duty-of-care clause survives reconciliation with the House package.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence68
- Adoption55
- Hype gap+12
- Incentives66
- Confidence70
Perspective Coverage
3 publishers- Builder
- Builder 27%
- Operator
- Operator 50%
- Investor
- Investor 23%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Two US senators wrote to TikTok about an experiment that switched off a safety feature for roughly 15 million American users.
- [2]
The letter runs to four pages, sets out 13 questions, and gives the company until 1 September to reply.
- [3]
The senators call the decision to run the test "depraved".
- [4]
Republican Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Connecticut Democrat Richard Blumenthal sent the letter on Wednesday, Bloomberg reported; it is addressed to TikTok chief executive Shou Chew and to Adam Presser, who runs the company's US spinoff.
- [5]
The pair asked for a list of every algorithmic experiment TikTok has run in the United States where it "withheld, disabled, delayed, or reduced a safety feature", the number of users caught in each one, and how many of those were minors.
- [6]
The stated purpose of the test was to find out whether protecting people would dent the bottom line.
- [7]
The experiment surfaced in a confidential TikTok document from 2023; lawyers handed it over in litigation against the largest social media companies, a court placed it under seal, and Bloomberg Businessweek reported its contents on 4 August.
- [8]
According to the document, TikTok turned off an algorithmic safeguard for 10% of its US users, making them a control group; the safeguard existed to break up echo chambers of harmful content, and 10% came to about 15 million people at the time.
- [9]
Chase Nasca, a 16-year-old from Bayport, New York, was selected at random on 25 January 2022 and died by suicide within a month.
- [10]
The document states: "TikTok's filter bubble prevention strategies did not take effect on this user by design."
- [11]
The document describes the choice as "a delicate balance across safety and the ability to measure impact on DAU (daily active users) and core metrics".
- [12]
TikTok did not respond to a request for comment on the letter; for the Businessweek investigation a spokesperson said the company is "deeply committed to the safety and well-being of users", especially teenagers, said "our hearts break for any family that experienced a tragic loss", and pointed to continued investment in Trust and Safety including detection systems and enforcement teams that remove content breaching community guidelines.
- [13]
Blackburn and Blumenthal co-authored the Kids Online Safety Act.
- [14]
The senators want the names of every employee who was told about the experiment, an explanation of why the company allowed minors into the test, when executives learned of it, and a "complete, unredacted version" of the internal document describing it.
- [15]
The senators wrote that Congress had been raising concerns about the algorithm pushing young users towards harmful content since October 2021, that the experiment began after that, and that TikTok was therefore on notice about how its recommendation systems affected children.
- [16]
The Kids Online Safety Act died in the House in 2024 and returned this session; on 5 August, the day after the Businessweek story ran, the Senate Commerce Committee voted to advance the revived version.
- [17]
The Senate text keeps a duty-of-care provision requiring companies to take reasonable care to prevent mental health harms to minors, including anxiety, depression and compulsive use; Blackburn argues it would deter future experiments because safety would have to be designed in from the start.
- [18]
The House took a different route, and its kids online safety package passed in June.
- [19]
If about 15 million users represented 10% of TikTok's US base, that base was on the order of 150 million users at the time.
- [20]
The gap between Congress first raising concerns in October 2021 and Chase Nasca's random selection on 25 January 2022 is roughly three months.
Sources
3 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- engadget.comSenators press TikTok on 'sinister' experiment that held back an algorithm safety feature
1 article · August 20, 2026
- techcrunch.comSenators demand answers from TikTok over experiment that disabled safeguards
1 article · August 20, 2026
- thenextweb.comTwo senators give TikTok until 1 September to explain its safety test
1 article · August 20, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- Platform Liability Litigation
- Recommendation Algorithms
- Child Safety Online
- Tech Regulation And Policy
- A/B Testing And Experimentation Ethics