Sol's 27-cent benchmark task undercuts Opus 5 by more than eleven times
Anthropic and OpenAI shipped cheaper model tiers minutes apart on Tuesday. OpenAI halved Sol's posted token prices, and the only per-task cost comparison between the two labs so far comes from OpenAI itself.
The Investor · Invest desk

What happened
- Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5.5 on Tuesday, saying it performs at the level of its Fable 5.1 flagship while costing around 40% less to run than Opus 5, which shipped in July.
- OpenAI put out GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna minutes later the same day, two cheaper tiers sitting below its GPT-6 Astra flagship.
- Both are the first releases since Dario Amodei's mid-September blog post laying out a plan to pace the frontier, which Sam Altman backed in an X post.
- CNBC reports both labs are under pressure from cheaper open-weight models from Chinese firms including Alibaba, Moonshot AI and DeepSeek.
Why it matters
- What it costs cost An inference line still sized on the rates in force last quarter is over-funded, and finance teams only capture the difference by re-baselining before the 2027 plan locks.
- Who has to decide decision Buyers have to pick which unit governs the contract: the price per million tokens that both labs publish, or a cost per task that so far only OpenAI has published.
- What it sets up precedent Anthropic put the safeguard tier it had reserved for Fable 5.1 onto a cheaper model. That sets the expectation that mid-tier releases arrive with frontier-grade testing attached.
Next story · Product · 4d ago
Muse Wonder Full sits just below Claude Opus 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis index, Meta saysConfirmed25 publishers
Luna's two legs fell by different proportions. The input price halved, the output price came down 58%, and a job that reads a million tokens and writes a million now bills 60 cents where it billed $1.40 [21][22]. Sol's cut is the clean one: $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output, against $4 and $20 before [4]. That is exactly half on each leg. The same token volume costs half what a plan written on the older rates assumed [23].
Per-token prices are comparable across vendors, but the per-task comparisons on the record come from OpenAI. AutomationBench is Zapier's test of whether an agent can carry a business workflow through 47 tools across sales, marketing, operations, support, finance and HR. On it, GPT-6 Sol at its highest reasoning setting passed 33.2% for $0.27 a task [25]. Claude Opus 5 at its own top setting passed 26.9% and cost more than 11 times as much per task, by OpenAI's numbers [26]. Eleven times 27 cents is $2.97, which works out at about 11 cents for each point of pass rate against Sol's 0.8 cents [28].
Anthropic counts its saving in tokens consumed, not in the price of a token [8]. Dianne Penn, head of product management, research and labs at Anthropic, told CNBC: "One of the things we're continuing to innovate on is how to make that thinking, how to make the answering more efficient, so it uses less tokens depending on your effort setting" [9]. The company said it is "passing these efficiency savings on to our customers in the form of price cuts and rate limit increases" [10]. Fortune, setting the two announcements side by side, found OpenAI cheaper per tier [16].
Randall Hunt, CTO at the AI consulting company Caylent, told Fortune that "CFOs have seen some of the sticker shock, and they haven't seen some of the gains that were promised in the initial investments." He added: "So they're coming back to their planning for 2027 and beyond, and saying, 'How can we optimize our costs here?'" [19] Caylent's method is to time how long employees take to finish tasks with AI tools and then compute a cost per task. OpenAI encouraged that approach in a blog post in mid-July 2026 [20].
OpenAI's 50% is measured against a promotion it is currently running on GPT-5.6, so the comparison is to a discounted rate [2]. Reasoning effort is an adjustable setting too: turn it up and the model spends more time and computing power double-checking itself, and accuracy and cost rise together [24]. A cheaper token at a higher effort setting can still produce a bigger invoice. "OpenAI and Anthropic are engaged in a price war that is driving down the price of AI," Ara Kharazian, lead economist at Ramp, told Fortune, "and therefore driving down their ability to profit from it and grow the price of models" [12]. On the bull case, he said: "AI bulls assume that there will be highly performant models that provide more and more value, and therefore they should be more expensive," and that "that is not how normal technology makes it to market" [13].
Neither release is a major step up in capabilities [27], and OpenAI credits its reductions to "improvements in caching and inference" [11]. In my view posted prices per token keep falling from here while total spend per customer rises, because the effort setting is where the volume goes. Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 are expected over the coming weeks [15]; if either arrives at a higher posted price than the model it replaces, that view is wrong.
What to watch
- An independent per-task benchmark of Sol against Opus 5.5, since the AutomationBench cost comparison now on the record was published by OpenAI.
- What happens to Sol and Luna pricing when the GPT-5.6 promotion the 50% cut is measured against ends.
- OpenAI's gradual rollout: both models are live in ChatGPT Work and Codex but not yet in the plain ChatGPT app.
Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence62
- Adoption25
- Hype gap+25
- Incentives70
- Confidence60
Perspective Coverage
16 publishers- Builder
- Builder 29%
- Operator
- Operator 35%
- Investor
- Investor 36%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Anthropic debuted Claude Opus 5.5, which it says performs at the level of its flagship Fable 5.1 model but costs around 40% less to run than Opus 5, which came out in July.
- [2]
OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, offshoots of its flagship GPT-6 Astra model, and cut the API cost by 50% compared with the pricing on a promotion it is currently running for GPT-5.6.
- [3]
OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna on Tuesday, minutes after Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5.5.
- [4]
GPT-6 Sol costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, down from $4 and $20.
- [5]
GPT-6 Luna drops to $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, down from $0.20 and $1.20.
- [6]
The releases are the first since Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published a blog post in mid-September laying out a plan to "pace the frontier," which OpenAI CEO Sam Altman supported in an X post.
- [7]
Opus 5.5 underwent Anthropic's most rigorous alignment testing to date, was evaluated by outside groups, and launches with the same tier of cybersecurity, biology and frontier-AI-development safeguards previously reserved for Fable 5.1.
- [8]
CNBC described Claude Opus 5.5 as a more token-efficient version that will cost around 40% less to run than Anthropic's Opus 5.
- [9]
"One of the things we're continuing to innovate on is how to make that thinking, how to make the answering more efficient, so it uses less tokens depending on your effort setting," Dianne Penn, head of product management, research and labs at Anthropic, told CNBC in an interview.
- [10]
Anthropic said the model is its most efficient, and it is "passing these efficiency savings on to our customers in the form of price cuts and rate limit increases."
- [11]
OpenAI attributes the cost reductions to "improvements in caching and inference" and says it is "passing those savings directly onto users and customers."
- [12]
"OpenAI and Anthropic are engaged in a price war that is driving down the price of AI and therefore driving down their ability to profit from it and grow the price of models," Ara Kharazian, lead economist at Ramp, told Fortune.
- [13]
"AI bulls assume that there will be highly performant models that provide more and more value, and therefore they should be more expensive," Kharazian said. "But that is not how normal technology makes it to market."
- [14]
The labs are facing pressure from companies offering cheaper, open-weight models, including Chinese firms Alibaba, Moonshot AI and DeepSeek.
- [15]
Opus 5.5 is the first release in a new family of models, with Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 expected "over the coming weeks," Anthropic said.
- [16]
OpenAI's release offers lower API pricing than Anthropic's, based on each company's announcement.
- [17]
Sol, a tier below Astra, is meant for more complex workloads like coding, while Luna is geared toward "high-volume tasks" like extracting information or summarizing documents.
- [18]
Neither Sol nor Luna is in the plain ChatGPT app yet, and OpenAI says it is rolling both out gradually throughout the day to keep the service stable.
- [19]
"CFOs have seen some of the sticker shock, and they haven't seen some of the gains that were promised in the initial investments," said Randall Hunt, CTO at the AI consulting company Caylent. "So they're coming back to their planning for 2027 and beyond, and saying, 'How can we optimize our costs here?'"
- [20]
Caylent calculates how long it takes employees to complete tasks with AI tools and then calculates "cost per task," an approach OpenAI encouraged in a mid-July 2026 blog post.
- [21]
Luna's input price fell by half while its output price fell about 58%.
- [22]
A Luna job that reads one million tokens and writes one million tokens now costs $0.60, against $1.40 at the previous rates.
- [23]
Sol's new prices are exactly half the old rates on both the input and output legs, so an identical token volume costs half what it did at the previous rates.
- [24]
Reasoning effort is a dial OpenAI added: turn it up and the model spends more time and computing power double-checking itself before answering, which tends to raise accuracy and cost together.
- [25]
On AutomationBench, a benchmark built by Zapier that tests whether an AI agent can carry out a full business workflow using 47 tools spanning sales, marketing, operations, support, finance and HR, GPT-6 Sol at its highest reasoning setting scored 33.2% for $0.27 per task.
- [26]
Claude Opus 5 at its own top setting scored 26.9% on AutomationBench, but cost more than 11 times as much per task, according to OpenAI's own numbers.
- [27]
The releases from both companies are not frontier models, in that they are not a major step up in capabilities.
- [28]
At more than 11 times Sol's $0.27, Opus 5 cost more than $2.97 per AutomationBench task, about 11 cents for each point of pass rate against Sol's 0.8 cents.
Sources
16 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- bloomberg.comAnthropic Unveils More Cost-Efficient Opus 5.5 Model Before IPO - Bloomberg
1 article · September 22, 2026
- cnbc.comAnthropic and OpenAI roll out cheaper models in first release since call for slowdown
1 article · September 22, 2026
- cryptobriefing.comAnthropic releases cheaper AI model ahead of potential trillion-dollar IPO
4 articles · September 23, 2026
- cryptopolitan.comOpenAI cuts GPT-6 Sol and Luna prices by 50% to defend developer share
1 article · September 22, 2026
- decrypt.coAnthropic’s New Claude Opus 5.5 Matches Fable at 60% the Price
2 articles · September 22, 2026
- finance.yahoo.comAnthropic launches Opus 5.5, its first model since CEO Amodei called for AI slowdown
2 articles · September 22, 2026
- fortune.comWhat AI slowdown? OpenAI, Anthropic release dueling models as price wars heat up
1 article · September 22, 2026
- I left Claude for months. Opus 5.5 is why I'm back
lennysnewsletter.com
1 article · September 22, 2026
- nytimes.comAnthropic Releases a New A.I. Model, Opus 5.5, Amid Safety Debate - The New York Times
1 article · September 22, 2026
- pivotnews.aiAnthropic cuts Claude Opus 5.5 token prices 20% as OpenAI answers within the hour
1 article · September 23, 2026
- pymnts.comAnthropic Cuts AI Processing Costs 40% With Opus 5.5 Debut
2 articles · September 22, 2026
- qz.comAnthropic launches Claude Opus 5.5 at lower cost, higher performance
2 articles · September 23, 2026
- techtimes.comAnthropic Claude Opus 5.5, OpenAI GPT-6 Sol & Luna Launch Today with Lower Costs
1 article · September 22, 2026
- thedailyupside.comMeta Keeps Muse Momentum as Rivals Push New AI Models
1 article · September 23, 2026
- The Most Important Market in AI is the Middle
tomtunguz.com
1 article · September 22, 2026
- verdict.co.ukAnthropic rolls out Claude Opus 5.5 across major cloud platforms
1 article · September 23, 2026