An Alberta model traces decadal day-length swings to the inner core's gravitational pull
Huifeng Zhang and Mathieu Dumberry reconstructed the torques between Earth's core and mantle and found the inner core's gravity driving the millisecond wobble in day length while electromagnetic and topographic coupling resist it.
The Scientist · Science desk
What happened
- Huifeng Zhang and Mathieu Dumberry report in Nature that multidecadal changes in the length of day are driven mainly by the inner core's gravitational torque, with electromagnetic and topographic coupling resisting it.
- A key input is a 2023 seismic study of the inner core's rotation relative to the rest of the planet since the 1960s, which found it turning slightly faster until about 2010 and more slowly after that.
- The other input is flow near the top of the fluid core, reconstructed from the geomagnetic field's secular variation, whose angular momentum already matched the observed day-length record.
- The reconstructed torque histories support a lowermost mantle with near-neutrally buoyant thermochemical piles, low-viscosity post-perovskite and a highly conducting iron-enriched layer a few kilometres thick at its base.
Why it matters
- What's now possible capability A few milliseconds of Earth's spin becomes a way to put numbers on the viscosity of post-perovskite and the conductance of the mantle's basal layer, quantities no seismic wave measures directly.
- What it limits constraint The deep-mantle inferences rest on one seismic estimate of inner core rotation, so a revision of that history means refitting the torques before the mineral-physics conclusions can stand.
- What doesn't add up contradiction Earlier work made the thin conducting basal layer the source of the driving torque; here the layer survives and its torque becomes the brake, so the same nutation-derived conductance now supports the opposite reading.
Next story · Science · 5h ago
Baker lab's from-scratch zinc proteases cut their chosen target in 36% of 135 designsConfirmed2 publishers
The solid inner core turns independently inside the molten outer core, and both sit within a ball of mostly iron roughly the size of Mars [16]. Averaged over time, the bumps on the inner core's boundary line up with the dense patches of mantle that pull on them, offset slightly to the east [10]. East-west flows in the outer core exert electromagnetic stress on the inner core and twist it out of that alignment, and the mantle feels a fluctuating gravitational torque in return [11]. Dumberry said the inner core "wants to be aligned" with the mantle because its dense regions are attracted to the mantle's dense regions, and that the generally westward flows of the outer core drag it out of line before gravity pulls it slowly back eastward [15].
The two rival torques each had a numerical problem. Viscous stress from core flows is far too small to do the job [18]. Electromagnetic coupling can reach the required magnitude if a several-kilometre iron-enriched layer with a conductance near 10^8 siemens lies at the base of the mantle, which studies of Earth's nutations have suggested [19], but predicted electromagnetic torques generally match the observed decadal record poorly unless the core flows are designed to produce the torque needed [20]. Topographic predictions built from geostrophic pressure and seismically derived maps of core-mantle boundary topography come out about 100 times too large, and they swing with small changes to the topography or the flow [21].
Earth-like dynamo models produce the same competition between the three torques that Zhang and Dumberry reconstruct [3]. "Before we obtained the result, we didn't know they are competing with each other," Zhang said [6].
Their record is short relative to the signal. Fluctuations of a few milliseconds run on periods of 10 to 70 years, and the series shown covers 1964 to 2019 [1]. That is 55 years, so the slowest component in the band never completes one cycle inside the data [23]. Only about nine years of the window fall after the 2010 turnaround in inner core rotation [24].
The same reconstruction also yields an inner core soft enough to deform within a few years and an upper limit on how strongly the top of the fluid core is stratified [9]. The authors write that their torque histories are tied to the accuracy of the inner core rotation and core flow models [17]. The signal underneath all of it is a few milliseconds of Earth's spin, measured by observing the planet's position relative to distant cosmic objects [8].
What to watch
- A published length-of-day prediction from the newer topographic torque formulation, based on core flows deflected over boundary bumps; the paper says none has been presented.
- Independent seismic work on the inner core's differential rotation since the 1960s, since the torque reconstruction inherits that model's errors.
- Revised estimates of the conductance of the mantle's basal iron-enriched layer, currently taken near 10^8 siemens from nutation studies.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence64
- Adoption
- Not scored
- Hype gap+20
- Incentives20
- Confidence60
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Length-of-day fluctuations of several milliseconds occur on timescales of 10-70 years, as shown between 1964 and 2019 in the paper's Fig. 1a.
- [2]
Proposed mechanisms for the core-mantle angular momentum exchange include electromagnetic and topographic coupling at the core-mantle boundary and a gravitational torque by the inner core, and the precise nature of the torque has remained unknown.
- [3]
The seismically reconstructed differential rotation of the inner core and core flows derived from magnetic field changes suggest that multidecadal length-of-day changes are driven primarily by the gravitational torque and resisted by electromagnetic and topographic torques, consistent with results from Earth-like dynamo models.
- [4]
Decadal length-of-day changes are caused primarily by an exchange of angular momentum between Earth's mantle and core.
- [5]
Dumberry said of the core-mantle torque: "This is the part that's unclear."
- [6]
"Before we obtained the result, we didn't know they are competing with each other," Zhang said.
- [7]
The reconstructed torque histories support a lowermost mantle featuring near-neutrally buoyant thermochemical piles, a post-perovskite phase with a low viscosity, and a highly conducting iron-enriched layer a few kilometres thick at its base.
- [8]
Geophysicists measure changes in the length of day by observing Earth's position relative to distant cosmic objects.
- [9]
The results also suggest a low-viscosity inner core deforming in only a few years, and yield an upper limit on the stratification at the top of the fluid core.
- [10]
On a time average, the topography of the inner core boundary should coincide, except for a small eastward offset, with the gravitational potential imposed by mantle density anomalies.
- [11]
Time-dependent azimuthal core flows exert electromagnetic stresses at the inner core boundary that rotate the inner core back and forth out of longitudinal alignment, causing a fluctuating gravitational torque on the mantle.
- [12]
Flows near the top of the fluid core can be reconstructed from the observed secular variation of the geomagnetic field, and predictions of length-of-day change based on the angular momentum carried by these flows match the observed changes well, confirming their core origin.
- [13]
Mathieu Dumberry, a geophysicist at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleague Huifeng Zhang, also at the University of Alberta, developed the model, reported in Nature.
- [14]
A key input was research published in 2023 that used seismic waves from earthquakes to measure the inner core's rate of rotation relative to the rest of the planet since the 1960s; it found the inner core spun slightly faster relative to the rest of the planet until around 2010, when it began rotating more slowly.
- [15]
Dumberry explained that the inner core 'wants to be aligned' with the mantle because its dense regions are attracted to the mantle's dense regions, but over time it gets pulled out of alignment by the generally westward flows of the outer core before being slowly pulled back eastward into position by gravity.
- [16]
Earth's core is a Mars-sized ball at the centre of the planet made up mostly of iron; the inner core is solid and can rotate independently within a molten, flowing outer core.
- [17]
The reconstructed torque histories are tied to the accuracy of the inner core rotation and core flow models.
- [18]
Core flows exert only a weak viscous stress on the core-mantle boundary, too small to explain the required torque.
- [19]
If a thin layer of iron-enriched material several kilometres thick, with a conductance of about 10^8 S, is present at the base of the mantle, as suggested by studies of Earth's nutations, electromagnetic coupling can produce a torque of the required magnitude.
- [20]
The match between predicted electromagnetic torque and the observed decadal length-of-day record is generally poor, unless core flows are specifically designed to match the required torque.
- [21]
Topographic torque predictions based on geostrophic pressure reconstructed from core flows and seismically derived maps of core-mantle boundary topography produce length-of-day changes typically 100 times too large, are highly sensitive to small changes in topography and core flows, and the validity of the approach has been questioned.
- [22]
No length-of-day prediction based on the topographic torque arising from the deflection of core flows over core-mantle boundary bumps has yet been presented.
- [23]
The length-of-day series shown spans 55 years, which is shorter than the 70-year upper end of the 10-70 year band of fluctuations being explained.
- [24]
About nine years of the 1964-2019 length-of-day window fall after the roughly 2010 reversal in the inner core's rotation relative to the rest of the planet.
Sources
2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- nature.comGravitational tug-of-war inside Earth is changing the length of our days
2 articles · September 22, 2026
- phys.orgEarth's deep secret: Why your day isn't quite 24 hours
1 article · September 24, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- Length-of-day variations
- Earth's core dynamics
Entities
- University of Alberta
- Nature
- Mathieu Dumberry