Skip to content

Product Reports disagree2 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

Two review gates, one nudify app: Meta sold the ads, Apple carried the product

Ads promising deepfake porn of women resembling US politicians cleared Meta's automated ad review, and the app itself sat in Apple's App Store. Both removals followed a WIRED inquiry.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Meta platforms recently ran ads for an AI porn-generation tool that seemingly encouraged users to create deepfaked videos resembling female US politicians, despite the company's policies against ads containing sexual material; it is the latest in a series of failures by Meta to keep ads for tools producing nonconsensual intimate imagery off its platforms.
  • The tool is called Kromix and bills itself as an "AI image styler."
  • A voice-over for one of the video advertisements viewed by WIRED promotes the tool as having "no restrictions," says "all the characters are real people," and describes it as "the AI that men actually use."
  • In one ad, a woman closely resembling a prominent female US politician is seen in front of a US flag and the flag of the president of the US above the caption "What if she moved?" She then winks, before the ad cuts to a scene of a woman with the same face performing in a pornographic video.
  • The Kromix app was hosted by Apple's App Store prior to a request for comment from WIRED, and invites paid users to upload photos so it can use them in scenarios including "bedroom rape" and "Disney love."

Why it matters

Meta's platforms ran ads for Kromix, an AI porn generation tool whose creative seemingly encouraged users to make deepfaked videos resembling female US politicians, despite Meta's policy barring ads that contain sexual imagery [1][8][17]. Apple's App Store hosted the app itself until WIRED asked about it, so the same product cleared two separate pre-publication reviews and was withdrawn at both gates only after a reporter made contact [4][6][21].

The creative was not subtle. A voice-over in one video ad promoted the tool as having "no restrictions," said "all the characters are real people," and called it "the AI that men actually use" [2]. In another, a woman closely resembling a prominent female US politician stands in front of a US flag and the flag of the president under the caption "What if she moved?", winks, and the ad cuts to a woman with the same face in a pornographic video [3]. The app, marketed as an "AI image styler," invited paying users to upload photos for use in scenarios including "bedroom rape" and "Disney love," and carried AI-generated pornographic videos of women in Spider-Man costumes [8][4][5]. A contact listed in the app did not respond to requests for comment [5].

Meta's own documentation says every ad is reviewed against its policies before it runs, and that "our ad review system relies primarily on automated tools" [15]. That system approved 32 ads from an account whose page had been created on August 3, shortly before the campaign began, and had no followers, two signals WIRED notes might have flagged it as suspicious [7][16][18]. The ads were targeted exclusively to male users under the tagline "Unleash Next-gen AI Magic," ran for between five and 46 hours, and mostly drew 10 or fewer impressions each [6][7]. On those figures the measured reach was small, in the low hundreds of impressions for the bulk of the campaign [19]. The defect is the gate, not the traffic: Meta's adult sexual exploitation rules already prohibit nonconsensual intimate imagery and the promotion of "nudify" or "AI kissing" apps [17], and researchers have found thousands of nudify ads the company failed to detect over the past few years [10].

Katie Paul, director of the Tech Transparency Project, which found the ads, said every nudify ad the group has seen so far exclusively sexualizes women, and questioned how Meta will handle the content when it is actively running such ads about female politicians [11]. Apple's record at its own gate is comparable: San Francisco's city attorney sent the company a cease-and-desist letter earlier this summer demanding the removal of 13 specific apps and that it stop "aiding and abetting" the sale of explicit deepfake images [9][20].

The supply side is well documented. Officials, overwhelmingly women, have been deepfake targets for years [12], and in January, as Grok was used to produce around 3 million sexualized images of women and girls, officials in Sweden, England and Northern Ireland were targeted, often starting from official images [13]. Benjamin Shultz of the American Sunlight Project says official portraits and press conference footage are now raw material for low- and no-code tools [14].

Watch whether Meta's automated review starts weighting cheap signals such as page age and zero followers before approving paid sexual-content ads [15][16], whether Apple's app review catches upload-your-photo apps at submission rather than after press calls [4][9], and what follows the San Francisco demand beyond the 13 named apps [20].

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence75
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives55
Confidence70

Perspective Coverage

3 publishers
Builder
Builder 22%
Operator
Operator 62%
Investor
Investor 16%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Meta platforms recently ran ads for an AI porn-generation tool that seemingly encouraged users to create deepfaked videos resembling female US politicians, despite the company's policies against ads containing sexual material; it is the latest in a series of failures by Meta to keep ads for tools producing nonconsensual intimate imagery off its platforms.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    A voice-over for one of the video advertisements viewed by WIRED promotes the tool as having "no restrictions," says "all the characters are real people," and describes it as "the AI that men actually use."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    In one ad, a woman closely resembling a prominent female US politician is seen in front of a US flag and the flag of the president of the US above the caption "What if she moved?" She then winks, before the ad cuts to a scene of a woman with the same face performing in a pornographic video.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    The Kromix app was hosted by Apple's App Store prior to a request for comment from WIRED, and invites paid users to upload photos so it can use them in scenarios including "bedroom rape" and "Disney love."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    Videos on the app also feature AI-generated pornographic videos of women wearing Spider-Man costumes, and requests for comment sent to a contact listed in the app went unanswered.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    According to Meta's ad library, the ads were exclusively targeted to male users with the tagline "Unleash Next-gen AI Magic," and they were removed after WIRED asked about them.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    The account tied to the campaign ran 32 ads, according to Meta, which ran for between five and 46 hours; most received 10 or fewer impressions.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  8. [8]

    The tool is called Kromix and bills itself as an "AI image styler."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    Apple has struggled to keep similar tools, which violate its policies against nonconsensual intimate imagery, nudifying, and sexually explicit content, off the App Store.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    Ads for nudify or undressing apps have been appearing on Meta's platforms frequently over the past few years, with researchers finding thousands the company had failed to detect.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  11. [11]

    Katie Paul, director of the Tech Transparency Project, which discovered the ads, says all the ads seen so far on the nudify issue are exclusively sexualizing and nudifying women and putting them into AI-generated porn, and that this raises questions about how Meta will deal with such content, including when it comes to female politicians, while the company is actively running ads containing it.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    Politicians and elected officials, overwhelmingly women, have been a target of nonconsensual deepfake images and videos for years.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  13. [13]

    In January, as Grok was used to create around 3 million sexualized images of women and girls, officials in Sweden, England, and Northern Ireland were targeted by people using the technology, often using official images as a starting point.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    Benjamin Shultz, lead researcher at the American Sunlight Project, says that as production and distribution of AI-generated content have democratized, formerly benign media such as official portraits and video from a press conference have become raw material for low- and no-code tools that anyone with an internet connection can use.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  15. [15]

    According to Meta's public documentation, each ad is "reviewed" against its policies before being published on platforms including Instagram and Facebook; the advertising standards say "Our ad review system relies primarily on automated tools to check ads and business assets against our policies," and that review starts before ads begin running.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  16. [16]

    The page running the advertisements was created on August 3, not long before the ads began running, and had no followers, two things that might have indicated to Meta that the account was suspicious.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  17. [17]

    Meta has a policy stating ads cannot contain sexual imagery, including nudity, sexual activity, or sexually suggestive content; its broader adult sexual exploitation policies say nonconsensual intimate imagery is not permitted and the promotion of "nudify" or "AI kissing" apps is not allowed.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  18. [18]

    Thirty-two ads were approved by a review system Meta says runs before ads go live and against policies that already prohibit promotion of nudify apps and sexual imagery.

    Derived Supported
  19. [19]

    With most of the 32 ads drawing 10 or fewer impressions each, the campaign's measured delivery was on the order of a few hundred impressions at most for the majority of its ads.

    Derived Supported
  20. [20]

    San Francisco's city attorney sent Apple a cease-and-desist letter earlier this summer demanding the removal of 13 specific apps and that it stop "aiding and abetting" the sale of explicit deepfake images.

    Reported ContestedView cited source
  21. [21]

    The same product passed two independent pre-publication review processes, Meta's ad review and Apple's App Store listing review, and was pulled from both only after a journalist's inquiry.

    Derived Contested

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. 9to5mac.com

    1 article · August 18, 2026

    Apple pulls AI ‘nudify’ app promoted in Meta ads
  2. arstechnica.com

    1 article · August 19, 2026

    Meta ran ads for an app promising to nudify female politicians
  3. wired.com

    1 article · August 18, 2026

    Meta Ran Ads for an App That Promised to Nudify Female Politicians

Topics and entities

Topics

Entities