The White House put a $303B number on tariff evasion. Read it as an audit notice
A 25-page OTMP report names about 40 countries and specific industrial districts as transshipment routes. The follow-through will land on documentation, not duty rates.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- The White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy released a 25-page report titled "The Great Transshipment Scam" on the 13th, local time, saying China has built a shadow transshipment network exporting to the US through some 40 countries, including Korea, where products undergo relabelling, repackaging, reinvoicing and simple assembly before re-export.
- The report estimated illegal transshipment amounts to as much as $303 billion a year.
- The administration claimed the US is losing between $19 billion and $26 billion in tax revenue annually as a result of transshipment.
- The report warned transshipment could displace about 450,000 jobs and reduce annual US gross domestic product by $113 billion to $150 billion.
- Last year, data from China's General Administration of Customs and the US Census Bureau showed a $112 billion gap between what China reported shipping to the United States and what the US reported receiving.
Why it matters
The White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy released a 25-page report on August 13 titled "The Great Transshipment Scam," alleging that China has built a shadow network routing exports to the United States through roughly 40 countries where goods are relabelled, repackaged, reinvoiced or lightly assembled before re-export [1]. For importers, the operative content is not the rhetoric but the geography: the report names specific industrial districts, which is how enforcement targeting gets built [16][10][11].
The headline figures do not sit comfortably together. The report puts illegal transshipment at as much as $303 billion a year and the resulting federal revenue loss at $19 billion to $26 billion [2][3]. That implies an effective evaded duty of only about 6.3 to 8.6 percent [12], which is hard to square with the report's own claim that the average US tariff on Chinese products is around 50 percent [25]. Even at the roughly 23 percent average the Penn Wharton Budget Model measured earlier this month, $303 billion of evaded volume would imply about $70 billion in lost duty, close to triple the top of the administration's estimate [26][13]. The report also asserts 450,000 displaced jobs and $113 billion to $150 billion in annual GDP damage, which is 4.3 to 7.9 times the revenue figure [5][24].
Outside estimates suggest the leakage is larger than the report concedes. Customs data from China and the US Census Bureau showed a $112 billion gap last year between what China reported shipping and what the US reported receiving [14]. Goldman Sachs calculated that the US lost $110 billion to $130 billion to tariff dodgers during Trump's first term, after 2018 duties on more than $250 billion of Chinese goods [8][9].
The causal chain is not disputed by the practitioners. "If your tariff was 0% there's no need to commit fraud," Flexport chief executive Ryan Peterson told Fortune, adding that higher rates create an incentive to lie about valuation, classification or country of origin [17]. Carrie Owens, a Kelley Drye partner and former head of CBP's Enforcement Operations Division, told Fortune transshipment is a bigger issue now because tariffs are higher across the board [18].
The named districts show what the compliance burden will look like. The report singled out the Gyeonggi semiconductor belt of Pyeongtaek, Yongin and Icheon as a route for Chinese chips, and said US industry in Phoenix, Austin, Portland and San Jose was harmed [16]. Yet the category cited, "other integrated circuits," accounted for $41.4 million of Korean semiconductor exports to the US in the first half, or 2.8 percent of the $1.479 billion total, according to the Korea International Trade Association [19]. Myongji University's Kim Tae-hwang said additional tariffs on all semiconductors would be hard to justify on that basis, but that proof-of-origin requirements on goods and intermediate products containing chips would raise costs [20]. Mexico's Guanajuato-Queretaro corridor, Ho Chi Minh City and Pune were named for motors, switching devices and pumps [10][11].
Meanwhile the incentive keeps widening. Trump's August 13 drone proclamation sets 100 percent on drones over 25kg or with thermal imaging, effective September 3, and 15 percent for Korea, the EU, Japan, Taiwan, Switzerland and Liechtenstein only if substantially all hardware, software and technology originates there [4][6][7]. That is an 85-point spread policed by paperwork [15].
Watch for origin-verification demands on intermediate goods, clearance delays at named ports, and whether CBP's enforcement staffing moves before the 25 percent small-drone tier lands on February 9, 2027 [20][6].
Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence50
- Adoption25
- Hype gap+40
- Incentives60
- Confidence60
Perspective Coverage
5 publishers- Builder
- Builder 19%
- Operator
- Operator 40%
- Investor
- Investor 41%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
The White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy released a 25-page report titled "The Great Transshipment Scam" on the 13th, local time, saying China has built a shadow transshipment network exporting to the US through some 40 countries, including Korea, where products undergo relabelling, repackaging, reinvoicing and simple assembly before re-export.
- [2]
The report estimated illegal transshipment amounts to as much as $303 billion a year.
- [3]
The administration claimed the US is losing between $19 billion and $26 billion in tax revenue annually as a result of transshipment.
- [4]
Trump signed a proclamation on the 13th imposing tariffs of up to 100% on drones and drone parts, based on a Section 232 report submitted by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on the national security impact of unmanned aerial systems imports.
- [5]
The report warned transshipment could displace about 450,000 jobs and reduce annual US gross domestic product by $113 billion to $150 billion.
- [6]
The 100% tariff applies to drones with maximum takeoff weight exceeding 25 kilograms and to drones with thermal-imaging capabilities, plus docking stations and certain key parts, taking effect at 12:01 a.m. Eastern on September 3; smaller drones and other parts face 25% beginning 12:01 a.m. on February 9, 2027.
- [7]
Drones and components from the European Union, Japan, Liechtenstein, South Korea, Switzerland and Taiwan face a 15% duty provided that substantially all of the hardware, software and technology originates in those countries or the United States; UK imports face 10%.
- [8]
Goldman Sachs calculated that the US previously lost between $110 billion and $130 billion in revenue from tariff dodgers during Trump's first term.
- [9]
Transshipment ramped up in 2018, when Trump in his first term imposed tariffs on more than $250 billion worth of Chinese goods, prompting rerouting through third countries, under-reporting of value and mislabelling of products.
- [10]
In Mexico's case the report identified the central Guanajuato-Queretaro corridor as a forward base for evading tariffs on electric motors, generators and transformers, and assessed that this harmed US companies in Detroit and Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Indianapolis, Indiana.
- [11]
The report named the European Union, India, Canada, Mexico, Taiwan and Southeast Asia as tariff-evasion routes, citing electrical switching, protection and connection devices exported from around Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam and a pumps and compressors production belt in Pune and Gujarat.
- [12]
The report's revenue-loss range implies an effective evaded duty rate of about 6.3% to 8.6% on the transshipped volume it cites.
- [13]
Applying the roughly 23% average tariff on Chinese goods to $303 billion of transshipped volume implies about $70 billion of lost duty, close to triple the top of the administration's $26 billion estimate.
- [14]
Last year, data from China's General Administration of Customs and the US Census Bureau showed a $112 billion gap between what China reported shipping to the United States and what the US reported receiving.
- [15]
The gap between the 100% top drone rate and the 15% allied rate is 85 percentage points.
- [16]
The report singled out the semiconductor belt in Gyeonggi Province - Pyeongtaek, Yongin and Icheon - as a route for evading tariffs on Chinese chips, and said US semiconductor industry in Phoenix, Austin, Portland and San Jose had been hurt because Chinese chips were entering via Korea.
- [17]
Ryan Peterson, CEO of Flexport, told Fortune: "If your tariff was 0% there's no need to commit fraud; there's no tariffs to evade. As those tariffs have gone way up, it's just created a huge incentive to change your terms of trade, to lie about the valuation or the classification or the country of origin of the goods."
- [18]
Carrie Owens, a partner at Kelley Drye & Warren and former head of the Enforcement Operations Division at US Customs and Border Protection, told Fortune that transshipment is a much bigger issue now because tariffs are higher across the board.
- [19]
Korean exports of "other integrated circuits" to the United States in the first half of this year came to $41.402 million, or 2.8% of total semiconductor exports to the United States of $1.479 billion, according to the Korea International Trade Association.
- [20]
Kim Tae-hwang, professor of international trade at Myongji University, said it will not be easy to impose additional tariffs on all semiconductors on this basis alone, but that if the US begins requiring proof of origin for various goods and intermediate products containing semiconductors, the burden on companies will grow.
- [21]
As of last year, China's DJI Technology held a 70% share of the US commercial drone market.
- [22]
After the Supreme Court struck down the lion's share of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the White House has tried to replicate high tariff levels through duties imposed under the 1974 Trade Act.
- [23]
A joint fact sheet from last year's Korea-US summit included language stating the two countries would work when necessary to prevent tariff evasion.
- [24]
The report's claimed GDP damage is 4.3 to 7.9 times its claimed federal revenue loss.
- [25]
The report said the average US tariff on Chinese products is currently about 50%.
- [26]
As of earlier this month, US tariffs on China were around 23%, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model, more than double the roughly 11% import tax on the country before the start of Trump's second term.
Sources
5 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- cnbc.comDrone stocks rally after Trump orders tariffs on foreign-made components
1 article · August 14, 2026
- en.sedaily.comTrump Slaps Up to 100% Tariffs on Chinese Drones, Parts
2 articles · August 14, 2026
- fortune.com‘If your tariff was 0%, there’s no need to commit fraud’: The White House is sounding off on a $112 billion tariff-dodging scheme it made worse
1 article · August 14, 2026
- scmp.comUS accuses Chinese exporters of masterminding ‘Great Transshipment Scam’
2 articles · August 14, 2026
- semafor.comTrump administration accuses China of dodging tariffs
2 articles · August 14, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- Section 232 tariffs
- US-China trade
- Tariff Evasion and Transshipment
Entities
- SK hynix
- Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
- Goldman Sachs
- Korea International Trade Association
- Penn Wharton Budget Model
- US Customs and Border Protection
- Howard Lutnick
- Samsung Electronics
- White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy
- Unusual Machines
- Kelley Drye & Warren
- AeroVironment
- DJI Technology