Skip to content

Science Independently confirmed2 publishers 2 min read Published

Uppsala's laser analysis finds an 18th-century blue in two patches of the 'L daVinci' Domitian

Twelve of the thirteen pigments in the Domitian portrait were available to Leonardo and Titian. The thirteenth is Prussian blue, first produced in the early 1700s, and it sits in the laurel wreath and in a jewel on the sword hilt.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Uppsala University researchers ran Raman spectroscopy on microscopically small samples from a portrait of the emperor Domitian signed "L daVinci" and identified 13 pigments in it.
  • Twelve of those pigments are traditional Middle Ages or Renaissance materials available to both Leonardo and Titian, including the cinnabar in Domitian's red hairband.
  • The thirteenth, Prussian blue, was not produced until the early 18th century, and it turned up in the laurel wreath on Domitian's head and in the blue jewel on his sword pommel.
  • The current owners found the "L daVinci" signature after inheriting the painting in 1994, followed by a word read as the Latin pinxit, meaning painted.

Why it matters

  • What's now possible capability Pinning a post-1700 pigment to two named passages gives a conservator something to act on: those layers can be treated as later repair and set aside when the rest of the surface is compared with any painter's practice.
  • What it limits constraint The signature itself is written in carbon black, in use since antiquity, so no pigment measurement can place the inscription in a century, and the one mark that would decide authorship stays outside the reach of this method.
  • Who has to decide decision An attribution case for this canvas now has to be assembled from provenance and art historical study, which the Uppsala team lists beside its own analysis instead of behind it.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction The two published accounts of the sale record disagree: Discover reports the painting appeared at Christie's in London in the 1920s and went unsold, while phys.org dates the London auctions to 1928 and 1929 and says it was attributed to Titian then.

Next story · Science · 2d ago

Sturgeon backbone tests show early tetrapod necks were stiff

Confirmed2 publishers

Raman spectroscopy identifies the compound in front of the laser, so a pigment dates a paint layer from one side only [2]. Prussian blue was first produced in the early 18th century, which makes it a floor: a layer containing it was applied after that date, and the layers beneath it are not dated by the finding at all [8]. Leonardo died in 1519, so the two passages carrying the blue went on at least 180 years after his death [21][23]. Twelve of the thirteen pigments were available in Leonardo's and Titian's time, which leaves one pigment carrying the whole dating result [5][24].

The laurel wreath is where the evidence is strongest, because two methods point at the same few square centimetres. X-ray imaging of the wreath shows several leaves that are visible on the painted surface and absent from the X-ray image [20], in one of the two areas where the blue appears [9]. That combination is what paint added over an existing composition looks like. "It is very common for paintings to be retouched. So, finding new pigments in limited areas does not necessarily mean that a painting is a forgery," Thyr said [10].

None of this touches the chronology that made the painting contested. Titian is believed to have painted 11 of the 12 Roman emperor portraits between 1536 and 1539, with the Domitian assigned to another hand [13]. The study's authors note that Leonardo died 17 to 20 years before that window, and they raise the possibility that the Domitian was finished first and inspired the rest of the series [21]. The series was reportedly sold from England to the Spanish Royal House and destroyed in a fire in 1734 [14].

The owners approached the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Uppsala through Lars Hälldahl, who had worked with Thyr on similar analyses of artworks [22]. Both published accounts describe the material only as microscopically small samples taken from different parts of the painting [18]. The signature that started the argument is faint. "The contrast against the background is low, and it really only becomes visible when the painting is illuminated from the right angle," Thyr said [11].

Thyr expects more of this work. "Materials science analyses can provide concrete answers to questions about art and archaeological artifacts. I believe this type of analysis will become increasingly common in the future," he said [25].

What to watch

  • Whether the Uppsala team publishes sample locations and counts, plus binder and ground analysis, which would show how much of the surface is original paint.
  • Whether further X-ray or infrared imaging turns up underdrawing that art historians can compare against documented Renaissance practice.
  • Whether provenance research fills the gap between the 1734 fire that reportedly destroyed the emperor series and the 1939 sale in Sweden.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence74
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+25
Incentives58
Confidence70
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Researchers at Uppsala University analysed the colour pigments in a historical painting signed "L daVinci"; the findings are published in the journal Materials Today Advances.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    Jakob Thyr and Tomas Edvinsson, of the Division of Solid State Physics at Uppsala University's Department of Materials Science and Engineering, used Raman spectroscopy, which uses laser light to identify chemical compounds.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The painting depicts the Roman Emperor Domitian.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    In total the researchers identified 13 pigments in the painting.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    Twelve of the 13 pigments are traditional pigments used during the Middle Ages or the Renaissance and were available in the time of Leonardo da Vinci and Titian.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    Cinnabar makes up the red pigment of Domitian's hairband, and carbon black was used in the signature.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    Carbon black, the black pigment in the signature, has been used since antiquity.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  8. [8]

    In two areas of the painting the researchers found Prussian blue, a synthetic pigment that was not produced until the early 18th century, so those particular layers of paint cannot have been applied during the lifetimes of Leonardo da Vinci or Titian.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    The Prussian blue was identified in two places: the laurel wreath on Domitian's head, and the blue jewel on the pommel of his sword's hilt.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    "It is very common for paintings to be retouched. So, finding new pigments in limited areas does not necessarily mean that a painting is a forgery. It may be that repairs were made or parts of the painting were touched up at a later date," Thyr says.

    Reported Supported Source: Jakob Thyr, Uppsala University, quoted by phys.orgView cited source
  11. [11]

    "The contrast against the background is low, and it really only becomes visible when the painting is illuminated from the right angle," Thyr says of the signature.

    Reported Supported Source: Jakob Thyr, Uppsala University, quoted by phys.orgView cited source
  12. [12]

    The results of the material analysis alone are not enough to determine who painted the artwork; it is one of several pieces of the puzzle, alongside art historical investigations, provenance and other scientific analyses.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  13. [13]

    The painting belonged to a series of 12 portraits of Roman emperors, 11 of which Titian is believed to have painted from 1536 to 1539; experts believe the 12th, the Domitian, was painted by another hand.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    The series is said to have been sold from England to the Spanish Royal House and was ultimately destroyed in a fire in 1734.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  15. [15]

    The Domitian painting appeared at Christie's auction house in London in the 1920s and went unsold at the time; in 1939 it was sold at an auction in Sweden and has remained in the purchaser's family since.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  16. [16]

    When the painting was auctioned at Christie's in London in 1928 and 1929, it was attributed to the Renaissance painter Titian.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  17. [17]

    The painting's current owners discovered a signature reading "L daVinci" after inheriting the work in 1994; the signature is followed by a word read as "Pinxt", an abbreviation for the Latin "Pinxit".

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  18. [18]

    Microscopically small samples from different parts of the painting were analysed to determine which pigments had been used.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  19. [19]

    The paper is Jakob Thyr et al, "Leonardo under cover: A Raman spectroscopy investigation of a historic painting", Materials Today Advances (2026), DOI 10.1016/j.mtadv.2026.100871.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  20. [20]

    X-ray examinations show signs of alterations in the laurel wreath on Domitian's head: several leaves visible on the surface of the painting do not appear in the X-ray image.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  21. [21]

    The study's authors say the case is muddled by the fact that da Vinci died in 1519, 17 to 20 years before the supposed time of completion of the series, and they raise the idea that the Domitian painting could have been the first completed, thus inspiring Titian to paint the rest.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  22. [22]

    The owners sought the assistance of the Uppsala researchers, and contact was arranged by Lars Hälldahl, who had previously worked with Jakob Thyr on similar analyses of works of art.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  23. [23]

    The earliest possible date for the Prussian blue layers, the start of the 18th century, falls about 181 years after Leonardo's death in 1519.

    Derived Supported
  24. [24]

    One of the 13 identified pigments accounts for the dating result, because the other 12 were available in Leonardo's and Titian's time.

    Derived Supported
  25. [25]

    "Materials science analyses can provide concrete answers to questions about art and archaeological artifacts. I believe this type of analysis will become increasingly common in the future," Thyr says.

    Reported Insufficient Source: Jakob Thyr, Uppsala University, quoted by phys.orgView cited source

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. discovermagazine.com

    1 article · September 15, 2026

    Lasers Unveil Modern Blue Pigment in Mystery Renaissance Painting Potentially Made by Leonardo da Vinci
  2. phys.org

    1 article · September 14, 2026

    A painting signed 'L daVinci': Analysis reveals Renaissance pigments and later alterations

Topics and entities

Topics

  • Heritage science
  • Historical pigments
  • Renaissance painting
  • Art authentication

Entities