Skip to content

Product Independently confirmed4 publishers 2 min read Published Updated

Nvidia hands the Open Compute Project its Vera Rubin rack and compute tray designs

Nvidia contributed its Vera Rubin rack and compute tray designs to the Open Compute Project at the project's Global Summit in San Jose. Nvidia says builders get common blueprints for racks, networking, power and cooling; the benchmark figures released alongside are its own.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Nvidia hands the Open Compute Project its Vera Rubin rack and compute tray designs
Generated illustration
Nvidia claims gains for Vera CPUs and USFP optics Nvidia's own performance claims for Vera CPUs and the USFP module, beside the Spectrum-6 chip's capacity and USFP's designed lane speed.

Key figures: Vera CPUs 1.8 times the previous Grace generation on Terminal-Bench, per Nvidia; Spectrum-6 Ethernet switching chip, 102.4 terabits per second; USFP designed for future 400-gigabit-per-second-per-lane fabrics; USFP power efficiency gain 1.3 times, per Nvidia.

Nvidia claims gains for Vera CPUs and USFP optics
FigureValueNoteClaim
Vera CPU vs Grace on Terminal-Bench, Nvidia's claim1.8 times15
Spectrum-6 switch chip102.4 Tbps12
USFP future lane target400 Gbps per lane14
USFP power efficiency1.3 x, Nvidia claim16

What happened

  • MGX 1.2 supplies open components for quickly scaling and bind-mating liquid cooling and rack-level interconnect on high-power AI systems.
  • Nvidia claims Vera CPUs run about twice as fast as the Grace generation on several workloads, and 1.8 times as fast on Terminal-Bench, a test of agent tasks in code containers.
  • Meta is adopting Nvidia's Spectrum-6 Ethernet switch for its next-generation AI factory network, connected directly to Vera Rubin deployments.
  • Nvidia will support Google's Falcon Transport in Spectrum-X Ethernet, starting with future ConnectX-10 SuperNICs and later BlueField hardware.
  • Nvidia and Cisco are defining the USFP optical module, with four times the bandwidth density of 200G OSFP and, by Nvidia's claim, 1.3 times the power efficiency.

Why it matters

  • What it limits constraint Shared rack interfaces do not open the network side. Meta's Spectrum-6, Falcon support in Spectrum-X and the USFP module are Nvidia products or Nvidia-led specifications, so dependence on Nvidia stays in the network layer.
  • Who has to decide decision Teams planning Vera Rubin builds have to choose between designing around MGX 1.2 power and I/O bay interfaces and keeping their own layouts. Nvidia's case for the first is easier field installation.
  • Who's exposed exposure A buyer sizing agent-orchestration CPU capacity on Vera is working from Nvidia's own 2x and 1.8x claims until someone else runs the same tests.

The first person to feel MGX 1.2 is the installer on the loading dock, standing next to a liquid-cooled rack that has to be plumbed and powered. For that person, Nvidia's offer is modularity. SiliconANGLE reports that MGX 1.2 adds standardized power and fanless, liquid-cooled I/O bays, changes it says can simplify both manufacturing and installation in the field [8].

The pitch is speed. Joe DeLaere, whom SiliconANGLE identifies as AI Infrastructure Solutions Lead, said: "The real bottleneck for the industry right now is how fast the world can manufacture and deploy AI factories" [6]. The thing delivered is a set of designs and components, and SiliconANGLE's account does not say what license applies or when parts ship.

The rack also has a CPU story. SiliconANGLE describes CPUs as the orchestrators that do most of the behind-the-scenes work while GPUs do the parallel execution [9]. DeLaere put the agent case this way: "Between model calls, agents need to do orchestration" [5].

Across the partnerships, SiliconANGLE writes, Nvidia is seeking to become the backbone for networking as well as supply the blueprints [10]. Spectrum-6, the switch chip Meta is adopting, is a 102.4 terabit-per-second part [12].

That mix of open and Nvidia-owned pieces is why we'd sort any Vera Rubin rack line item before talking price. One axis asks whether the interface is published in the open project or sits inside an Nvidia product or an Nvidia-led specification such as USFP [14]. The other asks whether the part gates install day.

Published and gating (the liquid-cooling connections, power and I/O bays, if they are as described): we'd ask for the designs and fit-test a sample before committing. Published and not gating: buy on price. Nvidia-only and gating: write delivery dates and a fallback into the contract. Nvidia-only and not gating: treat it as an ordinary vendor choice and decide later.

Most of the effort belongs in the first box. The tradeoff is that the box is only as good as the contribution package, so the first task is to read what was actually published.

What to watch

  • What the Open Compute Project actually publishes for Vera Rubin: the license, the drawings and the test specifications third-party builders can use.
  • Independent results for Vera against Grace, especially the 1.8x Terminal-Bench figure Nvidia supplied.
  • Dates for ConnectX-10 SuperNICs with Falcon support and for a finished USFP specification.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence52
Adoption30
Hype gap+25
Incentives70
Confidence62

Perspective Coverage

4 publishers
Builder
Builder 35%
Operator
Operator 36%
Investor
Investor 29%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Nvidia announced new partnerships and contributions to the open-source community at the Open Compute Project Global Summit in San Jose.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  2. [2]

    Nvidia contributed key Vera Rubin rack and compute tray designs to the Open Compute Project through the Nvidia MGX architecture.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  3. [3]

    The contribution will give system builders common blueprints for AI factories to develop future rack layouts, networking design, power and cooling systems.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  4. [4]

    The racks feature the Vera CPU rack design and extend the Nvidia MGX architecture beyond accelerated computing to handle intense agentic AI tasks.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  5. [5]

    "Between model calls, agents need to do orchestration," DeLaere said.

    Reported Supported Source: Joe DeLaere, quoted by SiliconANGLEView cited source
  6. [6]

    "The real bottleneck for the industry right now is how fast the world can manufacture and deploy AI factories," AI Infrastructure Solutions Lead Joe DeLaere said.

    Reported Supported Source: Joe DeLaere, AI Infrastructure Solutions Lead, quoted by SiliconANGLEView cited source
  7. [7]

    Through MGX 1.2, Nvidia is providing open components that let engineers quickly scale and bind-mate liquid cooling and interoperable, rack-level interconnect infrastructure for high-power AI systems.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  8. [8]

    MGX 1.2 adds modularity for liquid-cooled fanless I/O bays and standardized power, making it possible to streamline manufacturing and field installation.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  9. [9]

    CPUs are the orchestrators that do most of the behind-the-scenes work in deployed AI systems, while the GPUs do the parallel execution for the AI work.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  10. [10]

    Across these partnerships, Nvidia is seeking to build out not just the CPU-scale for AI factory blueprints but also become the backbone for networking.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLE's characterizationView cited source
  11. [11]

    Meta is adopting the Nvidia Spectrum-6 Ethernet switch for its next-generation AI factory network, which will connect directly to Vera Rubin deployments.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  12. [12]

    Spectrum-6 is Nvidia's 102.4 terabit-per-second Ethernet switching chip.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  13. [13]

    Nvidia is adding support for Google's Falcon Transport to its Spectrum-X Ethernet networking ecosystem, beginning with the future ConnectX-10 SuperNICs, with the roadmap extending to BlueField hardware.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  14. [14]

    Nvidia and Cisco are jointly defining a new optical module format, the Ultra-dense Small Form Factor Pluggable (USFP), designed to support future 400-gigabit-per-second-per-lane networking fabrics.

    Reported Supported Source: SiliconANGLEView cited source
  15. [15]

    Nvidia claims its Vera CPUs deliver around twice the performance of its previous Grace generation on several workload benchmarks, and a 1.8-times improvement on Terminal-Bench, which measures practical agent tasks involving code containers.

    Reported Insufficient Source: Nvidia's claim, as reported by SiliconANGLEView cited source
  16. [16]

    The USFP design will offer four times the bandwidth density of the existing 200G OSFP form factor, and Nvidia is claiming a 1.3-times improvement in power efficiency.

    Reported Insufficient Source: SiliconANGLE; efficiency figure is Nvidia's claimView cited source

Sources

4 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. datacenterdynamics.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    Nvidia opens up Vera Rubin rack and tray designs to OCP
  2. en.sedaily.com

    1 article · October 14, 2026

    Nvidia Opens Vera Rubin Rack Designs to Set Data Center Standards
  3. nvidianews.nvidia.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    OCP Global Summit: Amid Ecosystem Adoption, NVIDIA Opens Vera Rubin Architecture to Help Scale AI Factories Worldwide
  4. siliconangle.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    Nvidia tackles AI factory scaling bottlenecks with open rack designs and networking advances

Topics and entities