Skip to content

Science Widely confirmed5 publishers 3 min read Published

MeerKAT and Webb trace the most distant fast radio burst to a small galaxy at redshift 2.15

MeerKAT and JWST traced fast radio burst FRB 20240304B to a galaxy seen 3 billion years after the Big Bang, more than doubling the distance record. The small, star-forming host is one data point for young magnetars as the source of at least some of these flashes.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • MeerKAT, an array of 64 radio telescopes in South Africa, made the initial detection of the millisecond burst.
  • The host galaxy was too faint for the largest ground-based telescopes, so the team needed JWST to pinpoint it and measure its distance.
  • The study, led by Manisha Caleb and Themiya Nanayakkara of the University of Sydney, was published in Science.

Why it matters

  • What's now possible capability A precise radio position followed by a triggered JWST image can now find FRB hosts too faint for any ground telescope, so distant bursts can be tied to a specific galaxy.
  • What's now possible capability With a measured redshift for a burst that crossed most of cosmic history, its dispersion can be used to study matter between galaxies that is otherwise hard to observe.
  • What it limits constraint Each new distant host needs a radio localization first and then JWST time from a programme for time-sensitive work, and both limit how fast the sample grows.

The team knew the burst was far away before they had seen anything at its position. The radio signal arrived heavily dispersed, and that alone pointed to a distant source [9]. Deep searches with powerful ground-based telescopes then "saw essentially nothing; it looked like empty sky," the researchers told Live Science [11]. "The most likely explanation was that the galaxy was simply too faint to be detected in those observations. That is where JWST became transformative," they wrote [13].

The JWST time came through Director's Discretionary Time, a route meant for time-sensitive observations. The first step was a very deep image with the Near Infrared Camera [19]. "Suddenly, there it was: a very faint galaxy almost exactly where we expected the host of the FRB to be," Nanayakkara said [15].

I like the design. The position and the distance come from different instruments measuring different things. MeerKAT supplied "a very precise position on the sky," in Nanayakkara's words [6]. The dispersion depends on the material the signal crossed on its way here [14]. The spectral lines measure something else: how far the expansion of the universe has stretched light of known laboratory wavelength. JWST's spectrograph found hydrogen and oxygen lines, and their shift gave a redshift of about 2.15 [22]. "We are therefore seeing this galaxy as it was when the universe was only around three billion years old, so roughly one-fifth of its current age," Nanayakkara said [2]. Neither account reports how likely it is that an unrelated faint galaxy would sit that close to the burst position by chance.

FRB 20240304B more than doubles the previous FRB distance record [1]. That record was set in 2023 by a burst whose discovery also involved University of Sydney astronomers [7].

JWST also showed the host was smaller than expected, metal-poor and forming a lot of stars [3]. "The galaxy hosting this burst is surprisingly small, metal-poor and undergoing a very active episode of star formation," said Laura Driessen, a co-author at the University of Sydney [4]. Magnetars are highly magnetised neutron stars formed when massive stars explode. The team argues that a young, vigorously star-forming galaxy fits magnetar formation better than mergers of older neutron stars [10].

Astronomers have detected thousands of fast radio bursts [12]. This is one host, and the team limits its claim to at least some of them [10]. I think the magnetar point holds for this burst and goes no further. One galaxy at redshift 2.15 cannot say what share of all FRBs come from magnetars.

"Once our radio telescopes find and localize a suitable new source, we can trigger the JWST observations," Nanayakkara said [16]. So the number of hosts this distant depends first on radio arrays localizing bursts, then on getting JWST time [19]. Caleb said, "What is particularly exciting about our result is that we've now demonstrated that we can identify and study an FRB from when the universe was young." [8] Ben Stappers of the University of Manchester, principal investigator of MeerTRAP, said "The next step is to push this frontier further and see how close we can get to the first generations of stars." [17]

What to watch

  • Further MeerKAT-localized bursts followed up with JWST, and whether their distant hosts are also small, metal-poor and star-forming, which would test the magnetar link beyond a single galaxy.
  • Published measurements of the intergalactic gas along this burst's path, the use the University of Sydney team highlights for the signal.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence76
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+12
Incentives35
Confidence72

Perspective Coverage

5 publishers
Builder
Builder 49%
Operator
Operator 35%
Investor
Investor 16%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The burst originated when the universe was only about 3 billion years old, making it the most distant FRB yet detected and more than doubling the previous distance record; the MeerTRAP project used MeerKAT to detect it before identifying its host galaxy with JWST.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org (University of Sydney); also reported by Live ScienceView cited source
  2. [2]

    "We are therefore seeing this galaxy as it was when the universe was only around three billion years old, so roughly one-fifth of its current age."

    Reported Supported Source: Themiya Nanayakkara, to Live ScienceView cited source
  3. [3]

    JWST's observations showed the host galaxy was smaller than expected, metal-poor, and forming a lot of stars.

    Reported Supported Source: Live ScienceView cited source
  4. [4]

    "The galaxy hosting this burst is surprisingly small, metal-poor and undergoing a very active episode of star formation," said Dr. Laura Driessen, a co-author at the University of Sydney.

    Reported Supported Source: Laura Driessen, via phys.orgView cited source
  5. [5]

    FRB 20240304B was initially detected with MeerKAT, an array of 64 radio telescopes in South Africa.

    Reported Supported Source: Live ScienceView cited source
  6. [6]

    Nanayakkara said MeerKAT revealed "both the detection of the fast radio burst and, importantly, a very precise position on the sky."

    Reported Supported Source: Themiya Nanayakkara, to Live ScienceView cited source
  7. [7]

    In 2023, University of Sydney astronomers were involved in the discovery of what was then the most distant fast radio burst, a record now surpassed by FRB 20240304B.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org (University of Sydney)View cited source
  8. [8]

    "What is particularly exciting about our result is that we've now demonstrated that we can identify and study an FRB from when the universe was young."

    Reported Supported Source: Manisha Caleb, via phys.orgView cited source
  9. [9]

    The researchers knew the FRB was far away because of the large dispersion of the radio signal.

    Reported Supported Source: Live ScienceView cited source
  10. [10]

    The research provides evidence that at least some FRBs may originate from young magnetars, highly magnetized neutron stars formed in supernovas; the young, vigorously star-forming host is more consistent with magnetar formation than with mergers of older neutron stars.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org (University of Sydney)View cited source
  11. [11]

    Initial searches with powerful ground-based telescopes "saw essentially nothing; it looked like empty sky," the researchers told Live Science.

    Reported Supported Source: Nanayakkara and Caleb, email to Live ScienceView cited source
  12. [12]

    Astronomers have detected thousands of FRBs; they last only milliseconds and their origins remain unclear.

    Reported Supported Source: Live ScienceView cited source
  13. [13]

    "The most likely explanation was that the galaxy was simply too faint to be detected in those observations. That is where JWST became transformative."

    Reported Supported Source: Nanayakkara and Caleb, email to Live ScienceView cited source
  14. [14]

    As the radio signal traveled across most of cosmic history, it carried information about the material it encountered, giving astronomers a way to study otherwise invisible matter between galaxies.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org (University of Sydney)View cited source
  15. [15]

    "Suddenly, there it was: a very faint galaxy almost exactly where we expected the host of the FRB to be," Nanayakkara said.

    Reported Supported Source: Themiya Nanayakkara, to Live ScienceView cited source
  16. [16]

    "Once our radio telescopes find and localize a suitable new source, we can trigger the JWST observations."

    Reported Supported Source: Themiya Nanayakkara, to Live ScienceView cited source
  17. [17]

    Ben Stappers of the University of Manchester, principal investigator of the MeerTRAP project, said "The next step is to push this frontier further and see how close we can get to the first generations of stars."

    Reported Supported Source: Ben Stappers, via phys.orgView cited source
  18. [18]

    The discovery, led by Dr. Manisha Caleb and Dr. Themiya Nanayakkara at the University of Sydney, is published in Science under the title 'A fast radio burst at redshift 2, three billion years after the Big Bang'.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org (University of Sydney)View cited source
  19. [19]

    The team got JWST time through Director's Discretionary Time, a program aimed at time-sensitive observations, and used JWST's Near Infrared Camera to take a very deep image of the target region.

    Reported Supported Source: Live ScienceView cited source
  20. [20]

    The study was published Thursday, Oct. 8, in the journal Science.

    Reported Supported Source: Live ScienceView cited source
  21. [21]

    The host galaxy was invisible to the largest ground-based telescopes, requiring JWST to pinpoint it and measure its distance.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org (University of Sydney)View cited source
  22. [22]

    JWST's Near Infrared Spectrograph obtained a spectrum showing hydrogen and oxygen; measuring how far those lines, of known laboratory wavelength, had been shifted by cosmic expansion gave a redshift of about 2.15.

    Reported Supported Source: Live Science; NanayakkaraView cited source

Sources

5 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. livescience.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    James Webb telescope pinpoints the most distant 'fast radio burst' ever seen
  2. nasa.gov

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Webb Measures Distance to Farthest Fast Radio Burst, Suggesting Origin
  3. phys.org

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Astronomers pinpoint the most distant fast radio burst ever detected
  4. scientificamerican.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Astronomers discover record-breaking ancient cosmic outburst
  5. theguardian.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Astronomers detect mysterious burst of energy from a galaxy far, far away

Topics and entities

Topics

Entities