NFL backs New Jersey's Supreme Court bid to regulate Kalshi's sports contracts as gambling
The NFL asked the Supreme Court to back New Jersey against Kalshi, saying NFL games drew $1.8 billion of the $3.3 billion traded on opening Sunday. A ruling for the states would put the contracts that made up most of that day's trading under state gambling law.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- Federal appeals courts are split, with the Third Circuit siding with Kalshi and the Sixth and Ninth against it, and the Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear the case.
- A bipartisan group of 39 states and the District of Columbia has filed a brief backing New Jersey's petition.
- The league's filing says the CFTC, the federal regulator overseeing Kalshi, has 543 employees.
- Months of NFL talks with Kalshi, Polymarket and the CFTC produced no partnership before the season began, Front Office Sports reported.
- The NHL has partnered with Kalshi and Polymarket, while MLB, MLS and UFC have signed agreements with Polymarket.
Why it matters
- What it limits constraint A state win would let regulators impose the 21-year minimum most state sports-betting frameworks require, shutting out the 18-to-20-year-olds Kalshi accepts today.
- Who's exposed exposure Contracts on field goals, fumbles, injuries and officiating calls, the categories the league calls open to manipulation, are the first products state regulators would be in a position to pull.
- Who has to decide decision The NBA has circulated partnership proposals to Kalshi, Polymarket and Fanatics, and it now has to choose a side before its October 20 opener, with the NFL's brief already on file.
Next story · Invest · Oct 9
CFTC carves casino gambling out of its swap definition to claim event contracts for itselfConfirmed6 publishers
The circuit split that makes a grant plausible existed before the league filed. The Ninth Circuit ruled in August that states can enforce gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts [3], and the circuits now divide two to one against the company [19]. Quartz called the conflict "the kind of circuit split that draws Supreme Court scrutiny" [3]. Forty jurisdictions back New Jersey's petition: 39 states and the District of Columbia [20]. To that the NFL adds the sport with the most trading tied to its games, along with a question for the justices: "What constitutional power allows Congress to override states' traditional police powers to regulate intrastate gambling?" [11]
If the Court declines, the split stands. If it takes the case and Kalshi wins, sports contracts stay with the CFTC. The league says the agency's limited resources are the reason states are better placed to oversee these markets [10]. A New Jersey win would let states apply their own gambling rules to the platforms [12].
The volume figure explains why the platforms are fighting. NFL games took $1.8 billion of the $3.3 billion traded on opening Sunday [1]. That is about 55% [22], and every other contract on every platform shared the remaining $1.5 billion [23]. Crypto Briefing argued that the platforms' model depends on one federal framework, and that if the Court sides with New Jersey that advantage "could shrink considerably" [13].
I think a loss would make these platforms look more like sportsbooks, which already deal with dozens of state regimes, as Crypto Briefing described [13]. The league's own sportsbook partners, DraftKings, FanDuel and Fanatics, already run prediction market products alongside that business [17]. The counter-case is that the federal framework is most of what separates Kalshi from those three. Without it, Kalshi competes on their terms. For a standalone platform, that makes a loss a question of survival more than of cost.
The NFL's commercial choices line up with its brief. It has kept prediction platforms off its airwaves and declined commercial partnerships with them [18], and its betting deals are with sportsbooks [17]. Goodell confirmed on September 11 that the league was still talking to operators about changes that could make them partners [25]. The filings do not show those talks formally ending. "We don't feel like we have to be the first in this. We feel like we're going to be right, and the best thing to do is be patient," Goodell told CNBC [16].
This view is wrong if a state win ends with states refusing to license sports contracts at all. The league's stated position points the other way. It said it is not opposed to prediction markets in principle, and it considers state regulators better placed than the CFTC to oversee them [10].
What to watch
- The Supreme Court's decision on whether to hear New Jersey's petition against Kalshi.
- Final CFTC rules on sports contracts, after the NFL argued in July that the proposed version fell short of protections sportsbooks already have to meet.
Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence74
- Adoption72
- Hype gap+10
- Incentives74
- Confidence70
Perspective Coverage
11 publishers- Builder
- Builder 9%
- Operator
- Operator 44%
- Investor
- Investor 47%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
In its brief, the NFL said $1.8 billion of the $3.3 billion traded on prediction markets during the season's opening Sunday involved NFL games.
- [2]
Federal appeals courts are split on whether federal commodities law stops states regulating sports event contracts as gambling: the Third Circuit backed Kalshi and the Sixth and Ninth Circuits sided against it. The Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear the case.
- [3]
The Ninth Circuit ruled in August that states can enforce gambling laws against sports prediction market platforms, creating a conflict with the Third Circuit that Quartz described as 'the kind of circuit split that draws Supreme Court scrutiny.'
- [4]
The NFL filed an amicus brief on Thursday supporting New Jersey against Kalshi and asking the Supreme Court to review the case.
- [5]
A bipartisan group of 39 states and the District of Columbia filed a brief backing New Jersey's petition against Kalshi.
- [6]
The CFTC, which oversees platforms like Kalshi at the federal level, has only 543 employees, according to the league's filing.
- [7]
The NFL wants a minimum betting age of 21; Kalshi currently allows users aged 18 and up.
- [8]
Most state sports-betting frameworks require a 21-year minimum age.
- [9]
The NHL partnered with both Kalshi and Polymarket, while UFC, MLS and MLB signed agreements with Polymarket.
- [10]
The NFL said it is not opposed to prediction markets in principle but believes state regulators are better positioned than the CFTC to oversee them, given the agency's resource constraints.
- [11]
"What constitutional power allows Congress to override states' traditional police powers to regulate intrastate gambling?"
- [12]
If the justices agree with the NFL, states could apply their own gambling rules to platforms like Kalshi.
- [13]
The platforms' model depends on operating under a single federal framework; if the Supreme Court sides with New Jersey and its allies, that advantage 'could shrink considerably,' and operators could end up navigating dozens of state regimes, much like traditional sportsbooks do today.
- [14]
The NFL flagged contract categories it views as open to exploitation, among them wagers on field goals, fumbles, injuries and officiating calls, and has pushed platforms to eliminate them.
- [15]
In July the NFL argued that the CFTC's proposed rules fell short of protections already required of traditional sportsbooks.
- [16]
"We don't feel like we have to be the first in this. We feel like we're going to be right, and the best thing to do is be patient," Goodell told CNBC.
- [17]
The NFL renewed sportsbook deals with DraftKings and FanDuel and added Fanatics in August; all three also operate prediction market products.
- [18]
The NFL has kept prediction platforms off its airwaves and has declined to enter into any commercial partnerships with them.
- [19]
The appeals courts divide two to one against Kalshi.
- [20]
Forty jurisdictions back New Jersey's petition.
- [21]
Front Office Sports reported in September that the NBA had circulated partnership proposals to several operators, including Kalshi, Polymarket and Fanatics; the NBA's season opens October 20.
- [22]
NFL games accounted for about 55% of prediction market trading on opening Sunday.
- [23]
All non-NFL contracts across all platforms drew about $1.5 billion on opening Sunday.
- [24]
According to Front Office Sports, the NFL held discussions with Kalshi, Polymarket and the CFTC for months, but no partnership materialized before the season began.
- [25]
In a CNBC interview published September 11, Commissioner Roger Goodell confirmed the league was still speaking with operators about changes that could make them potential partners.
Sources
11 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- bankless.comNFL Joins States in Fight Against Prediction Markets
2 articles · October 8, 2026
- cbsnews.comNFL urges Supreme Court to decide who should regulate prediction markets
1 article · October 8, 2026
- coindesk.comNFL joins pushback against prediction markets as U.S. Supreme Court asked to act
1 article · October 8, 2026
- cointelegraph.comNFL backs New Jersey authorities in SCOTUS petition over Kalshi
1 article · October 8, 2026
- cryptobriefing.comNFL asks Supreme Court to let states regulate prediction markets
1 article · October 8, 2026
- cryptopolitan.comNFL says sports prediction contracts should be designated as gambling
1 article · October 8, 2026
- decrypt.coNFL Sides With States Against Kalshi in Supreme Court Prediction Market Fight
1 article · October 8, 2026
- fortune.comNFL urges Supreme Court to back state gambling rules—breaking with other leagues on prediction markets
1 article · October 8, 2026
- news.bitcoin.comNFL Joins 39 States, Global Regulators in Pushing Supreme Court on Kalshi Case
1 article · October 8, 2026
- pymnts.comNFL Urges Supreme Court to Allow State Oversight of Prediction Markets
1 article · October 8, 2026
- qz.comNFL is urging the Supreme Court to let states regulate sports prediction markets as gambling
1 article · October 8, 2026
Topics and entities
Topics
- Prediction Markets
- Sports Betting Regulation
- Federal-State Preemption