Skip to content

Invest Reports disagree11 publishers 3 min read Published

NFL backs New Jersey's Supreme Court bid to regulate Kalshi's sports contracts as gambling

The NFL asked the Supreme Court to back New Jersey against Kalshi, saying NFL games drew $1.8 billion of the $3.3 billion traded on opening Sunday. A ruling for the states would put the contracts that made up most of that day's trading under state gambling law.

The Investor · Invest desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • Federal appeals courts are split, with the Third Circuit siding with Kalshi and the Sixth and Ninth against it, and the Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear the case.
  • A bipartisan group of 39 states and the District of Columbia has filed a brief backing New Jersey's petition.
  • The league's filing says the CFTC, the federal regulator overseeing Kalshi, has 543 employees.
  • Months of NFL talks with Kalshi, Polymarket and the CFTC produced no partnership before the season began, Front Office Sports reported.
  • The NHL has partnered with Kalshi and Polymarket, while MLB, MLS and UFC have signed agreements with Polymarket.

Why it matters

  • What it limits constraint A state win would let regulators impose the 21-year minimum most state sports-betting frameworks require, shutting out the 18-to-20-year-olds Kalshi accepts today.
  • Who's exposed exposure Contracts on field goals, fumbles, injuries and officiating calls, the categories the league calls open to manipulation, are the first products state regulators would be in a position to pull.
  • Who has to decide decision The NBA has circulated partnership proposals to Kalshi, Polymarket and Fanatics, and it now has to choose a side before its October 20 opener, with the NFL's brief already on file.

The circuit split that makes a grant plausible existed before the league filed. The Ninth Circuit ruled in August that states can enforce gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts [3], and the circuits now divide two to one against the company [19]. Quartz called the conflict "the kind of circuit split that draws Supreme Court scrutiny" [3]. Forty jurisdictions back New Jersey's petition: 39 states and the District of Columbia [20]. To that the NFL adds the sport with the most trading tied to its games, along with a question for the justices: "What constitutional power allows Congress to override states' traditional police powers to regulate intrastate gambling?" [11]

If the Court declines, the split stands. If it takes the case and Kalshi wins, sports contracts stay with the CFTC. The league says the agency's limited resources are the reason states are better placed to oversee these markets [10]. A New Jersey win would let states apply their own gambling rules to the platforms [12].

The volume figure explains why the platforms are fighting. NFL games took $1.8 billion of the $3.3 billion traded on opening Sunday [1]. That is about 55% [22], and every other contract on every platform shared the remaining $1.5 billion [23]. Crypto Briefing argued that the platforms' model depends on one federal framework, and that if the Court sides with New Jersey that advantage "could shrink considerably" [13].

I think a loss would make these platforms look more like sportsbooks, which already deal with dozens of state regimes, as Crypto Briefing described [13]. The league's own sportsbook partners, DraftKings, FanDuel and Fanatics, already run prediction market products alongside that business [17]. The counter-case is that the federal framework is most of what separates Kalshi from those three. Without it, Kalshi competes on their terms. For a standalone platform, that makes a loss a question of survival more than of cost.

The NFL's commercial choices line up with its brief. It has kept prediction platforms off its airwaves and declined commercial partnerships with them [18], and its betting deals are with sportsbooks [17]. Goodell confirmed on September 11 that the league was still talking to operators about changes that could make them partners [25]. The filings do not show those talks formally ending. "We don't feel like we have to be the first in this. We feel like we're going to be right, and the best thing to do is be patient," Goodell told CNBC [16].

This view is wrong if a state win ends with states refusing to license sports contracts at all. The league's stated position points the other way. It said it is not opposed to prediction markets in principle, and it considers state regulators better placed than the CFTC to oversee them [10].

What to watch

  • The Supreme Court's decision on whether to hear New Jersey's petition against Kalshi.
  • Final CFTC rules on sports contracts, after the NFL argued in July that the proposed version fell short of protections sportsbooks already have to meet.

Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence74
Adoption72
Hype gap+10
Incentives74
Confidence70

Perspective Coverage

11 publishers
Builder
Builder 9%
Operator
Operator 44%
Investor
Investor 47%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    In its brief, the NFL said $1.8 billion of the $3.3 billion traded on prediction markets during the season's opening Sunday involved NFL games.

    Reported Supported Source: NFL amicus brief, as reported by Bankless, Crypto Briefing and QuartzView cited source
  2. [2]

    Federal appeals courts are split on whether federal commodities law stops states regulating sports event contracts as gambling: the Third Circuit backed Kalshi and the Sixth and Ninth Circuits sided against it. The Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear the case.

    Reported Supported Source: BanklessView cited source
  3. [3]

    The Ninth Circuit ruled in August that states can enforce gambling laws against sports prediction market platforms, creating a conflict with the Third Circuit that Quartz described as 'the kind of circuit split that draws Supreme Court scrutiny.'

    Reported Supported Source: QuartzView cited source
  4. [4]

    The NFL filed an amicus brief on Thursday supporting New Jersey against Kalshi and asking the Supreme Court to review the case.

    Reported Supported Source: BanklessView cited source
  5. [5]

    A bipartisan group of 39 states and the District of Columbia filed a brief backing New Jersey's petition against Kalshi.

    Reported Supported Source: Crypto BriefingView cited source
  6. [6]

    The CFTC, which oversees platforms like Kalshi at the federal level, has only 543 employees, according to the league's filing.

    Reported Supported Source: NFL filing, as reported by Crypto BriefingView cited source
  7. [7]

    The NFL wants a minimum betting age of 21; Kalshi currently allows users aged 18 and up.

    Reported Supported Source: Crypto BriefingView cited source
  8. [8]

    Most state sports-betting frameworks require a 21-year minimum age.

    Reported Supported Source: QuartzView cited source
  9. [9]

    The NHL partnered with both Kalshi and Polymarket, while UFC, MLS and MLB signed agreements with Polymarket.

    Reported Supported Source: BanklessView cited source
  10. [10]

    The NFL said it is not opposed to prediction markets in principle but believes state regulators are better positioned than the CFTC to oversee them, given the agency's resource constraints.

    Reported Supported Source: Quartz, citing CNBCView cited source
  11. [11]

    "What constitutional power allows Congress to override states' traditional police powers to regulate intrastate gambling?"

    Reported Supported Source: NFL amicus brief, as quoted by QuartzView cited source
  12. [12]

    If the justices agree with the NFL, states could apply their own gambling rules to platforms like Kalshi.

    Reported Supported Source: Crypto BriefingView cited source
  13. [13]

    The platforms' model depends on operating under a single federal framework; if the Supreme Court sides with New Jersey and its allies, that advantage 'could shrink considerably,' and operators could end up navigating dozens of state regimes, much like traditional sportsbooks do today.

    Reported Supported Source: Crypto Briefing analysisView cited source
  14. [14]

    The NFL flagged contract categories it views as open to exploitation, among them wagers on field goals, fumbles, injuries and officiating calls, and has pushed platforms to eliminate them.

    Reported Supported Source: QuartzView cited source
  15. [15]

    In July the NFL argued that the CFTC's proposed rules fell short of protections already required of traditional sportsbooks.

    Reported Supported Source: BanklessView cited source
  16. [16]

    "We don't feel like we have to be the first in this. We feel like we're going to be right, and the best thing to do is be patient," Goodell told CNBC.

    Reported Supported Source: Roger Goodell to CNBC, via QuartzView cited source
  17. [17]

    The NFL renewed sportsbook deals with DraftKings and FanDuel and added Fanatics in August; all three also operate prediction market products.

    Reported Supported Source: BanklessView cited source
  18. [18]

    The NFL has kept prediction platforms off its airwaves and has declined to enter into any commercial partnerships with them.

    Reported Supported Source: QuartzView cited source
  19. [19]

    The appeals courts divide two to one against Kalshi.

    Derived Supported
  20. [20]

    Forty jurisdictions back New Jersey's petition.

    Derived Supported
  21. [21]

    Front Office Sports reported in September that the NBA had circulated partnership proposals to several operators, including Kalshi, Polymarket and Fanatics; the NBA's season opens October 20.

    Reported Supported Source: Front Office Sports, via BanklessView cited source
  22. [22]

    NFL games accounted for about 55% of prediction market trading on opening Sunday.

    Derived Supported
  23. [23]

    All non-NFL contracts across all platforms drew about $1.5 billion on opening Sunday.

    Derived Supported
  24. [24]

    According to Front Office Sports, the NFL held discussions with Kalshi, Polymarket and the CFTC for months, but no partnership materialized before the season began.

    Reported Contested Source: Front Office Sports, via BanklessView cited source
  25. [25]

    In a CNBC interview published September 11, Commissioner Roger Goodell confirmed the league was still speaking with operators about changes that could make them potential partners.

    Reported Contested Source: Bankless, citing CNBCView cited source

Sources

11 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. bankless.com

    2 articles · October 8, 2026

    NFL Joins States in Fight Against Prediction Markets
  2. cbsnews.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL urges Supreme Court to decide who should regulate prediction markets
  3. coindesk.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL joins pushback against prediction markets as U.S. Supreme Court asked to act
  4. cointelegraph.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL backs New Jersey authorities in SCOTUS petition over Kalshi
  5. cryptobriefing.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL asks Supreme Court to let states regulate prediction markets
  6. cryptopolitan.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL says sports prediction contracts should be designated as gambling
  7. decrypt.co

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL Sides With States Against Kalshi in Supreme Court Prediction Market Fight
  8. fortune.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL urges Supreme Court to back state gambling rules—breaking with other leagues on prediction markets
  9. news.bitcoin.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL Joins 39 States, Global Regulators in Pushing Supreme Court on Kalshi Case
  10. pymnts.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL Urges Supreme Court to Allow State Oversight of Prediction Markets
  11. qz.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    NFL is urging the Supreme Court to let states regulate sports prediction markets as gambling

Topics and entities

Topics