Skip to content

Invest Widely confirmed5 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

Polymarket's February deposit rejections ran at eighty times the industry rate

The Wall Street Journal reported that Checkout.com blocked most Polymarket US card deposits at February's peak, and the controls that pulled fraud back to normal by May were a cap on cards per account and an outside vendor.

The Investor · Invest desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Polymarket's February deposit rejections ran at eighty times the industry rate
Generated illustration

What happened

  • The Wall Street Journal reported that criminals linked stolen cards to thousands of Polymarket US accounts, funded them, pushed the money through trading, then withdrew to cards or accounts they controlled.
  • At February's peak, Checkout.com rejected more than 80% of the deposits it handled for Polymarket as fraudulent, a rate the Journal set against an industry level of roughly 1%.
  • A Sept. 19 report put the attempted total at at least $10 million in illicit withdrawals and wagers on the U.S. platform in February.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure Under Checkout.com's terms the merchant owns the accept-or-cancel decision, so Polymarket carries the consequences of a filter tuned by a third party.
  • What it sets up precedent With Visa pressing processors to tighten screening, the cost of onboarding a US prediction-market customer gets set by card-network dispute rates and not by derivatives status.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction The headline $10 million is attempted volume and Checkout.com has not confirmed the 80% figure, so the same evidence supports either a large loss event or screening that held.

Eighty times the norm is the relationship between the two rates in the Journal's account [22], and a rejection rate measures screening, not money lost. Fewer than one in five attempted deposits got through at the peak, four blocked for every one approved [23]. The $10 million is what fraudsters allegedly tried to move, and the public reporting reviewed by crypto.news does not provide a final amount successfully withdrawn [8].

The rejection rate is not purely the processor's call. Checkout.com sells merchants fraud-scoring, transaction-filtering and authentication tools, and its current service terms state that merchants remain responsible for deciding whether transactions are accepted or canceled [20]. Checkout.com has not confirmed the 80% figure in a public statement reviewed for the crypto.news report [19].

The controls that worked were payments controls. Polymarket limited how many debit cards a user could connect to an account and brought in Riskified as an outside antifraud provider, whose Polymarket-specific fraud numbers are not public [11], and by May fraud rates had moved back toward industry levels [10]. That is roughly three months between the February peak and the return to normal [18]. Earlier, according to the Journal, Polymarket had required some withdrawals to return to the same payment source that funded the account, then loosened that restriction [12]. A same-source rule sends the money back to the card it came from. Without it, a funded balance can leave to a destination the depositor picked.

QCX LLC, doing business as Polymarket US, has been a CFTC-designated contract market since July 2025 [15], and it is legally separate from the company's international blockchain-based market [16]. The rulebook version certified in April lets the exchange restrict accounts and place customers into liquidation-only status [14]. Those powers reach an account after a deposit has cleared. The authorisation decision sits upstream, and The Information reported Visa pushing payment processors to tighten screening as disputed transactions increased [21]. On this record the repair came from the card stack; what the CFTC asked QCX for on payments screening is not in the reporting.

I'd expect the durable cost here to be deposit conversion in the US, because a filter aggressive enough to stop four in five attempts also turns away customers whose cards are their own, and the exchange cannot tell which without letting some through. The other reading is kinder: an 80% block rate is screening that worked, in which case February was mostly an expense for the processor and the networks. A third reading matters more for anyone pricing the business: a months-long dispute problem requiring an outside vendor makes the acquiring relationship the scarce input.

Current and former employees told the Journal that compliance workers escalated concerns about the surge to chief executive Shayne Coplan [5]. According to people cited by the newspaper, Coplan responded, "Just keep growing and pay a fine if regulators ever find out" [6]. Polymarket has not publicly confirmed that Coplan made the remark [7], and told the Journal that it maintains procedures to identify and respond to suspicious activity and remains committed to cooperating with regulators and law enforcement [17]. The company has hired Warren Jenson as chief financial officer and is expanding compliance, investigations and risk management staffing [13].

What to watch

  • Any statement from Checkout.com confirming or disputing the 80% rejection rate attributed to it.
  • Whether QCX files rulebook or CFTC amendments that reach payments screening rather than account restrictions.
  • Whether Visa or the acquiring chain discloses dispute volumes that show who absorbed the February transactions.

Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+30
Incentives60
Confidence55

Perspective Coverage

5 publishers
Builder
Builder 19%
Operator
Operator 48%
Investor
Investor 33%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    A Sept. 19 report said fraudsters used stolen debit cards on Polymarket's U.S. platform in February to attempt at least $10 million in illicit withdrawals and wagers.

    Reported Supported Source: crypto.news, citing a Sept. 19 reportView cited source
  2. [2]

    The Wall Street Journal reported that criminals connected stolen cards to thousands of Polymarket US accounts, funded them and then tried to move the money through trading before withdrawing it to cards or accounts they controlled.

    Reported Supported Source: The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  3. [3]

    At the peak of the February attack, payment processor Checkout.com rejected more than 80% of deposits it handled for Polymarket as fraudulent, according to the Journal.

    Reported Supported Source: The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  4. [4]

    The Journal compared the Polymarket rejection rate with an industry level of roughly 1%.

    Reported Supported Source: The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  5. [5]

    Current and former employees told the Journal that compliance workers escalated concerns about the surge to Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan.

    Reported Supported Source: current and former employees, via The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  6. [6]

    "Just keep growing and pay a fine if regulators ever find out."

    Reported Supported Source: Shayne Coplan, according to people cited by The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  7. [7]

    Polymarket has not publicly confirmed that Coplan made the remark.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  8. [8]

    The $10 million figure represents the amount fraudsters allegedly tried to move, not a confirmed loss suffered by customers or Polymarket, and public reporting reviewed by crypto.news does not provide a final amount successfully withdrawn through the February scheme.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    Elevated fraud continued for several months after February, though rejection rates did not return to the peak recorded during the first wave.

    Reported Supported Source: The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  10. [10]

    By May, fraud rates had reportedly moved back toward normal industry levels after Polymarket limited how many debit cards users could connect to their accounts and brought in Riskified as an outside antifraud provider.

    Reported Supported Source: The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  11. [11]

    Riskified provides automated fraud-decision systems combining machine-learning risk scoring with merchant transaction controls, and has not publicly disclosed Polymarket-specific fraud numbers.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    The Journal reported that Polymarket initially required some withdrawals to return to the same payment source that had funded an account, and later loosened that restriction, citing employees who raised concerns about financial-crime risks.

    Reported Supported Source: The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  13. [13]

    Polymarket recently hired Warren Jenson as CFO while expanding compliance, investigations and risk management staffing.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    Polymarket's current U.S. rulebook gives the exchange authority to restrict accounts, place customers into liquidation-only status and take other steps to protect customers and market integrity; the CFTC filing containing the March 20 version was certified in April.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  15. [15]

    The CFTC's current register lists QCX LLC, doing business as Polymarket US, as a designated contract market; QCX received its designation in July 2025 before operating under the Polymarket US name.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  16. [16]

    Polymarket US is legally separate from the company's international blockchain-based prediction market.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  17. [17]

    Polymarket told the Journal that it maintains procedures to identify and respond to suspicious activity and remains committed to cooperating with regulators and law enforcement.

    Reported Supported Source: Polymarket, via The Wall Street JournalView cited source
  18. [18]

    The gap between the February peak and the May return toward industry norms is roughly three months.

    Derived Supported
  19. [19]

    The 80% figure has not been independently confirmed by Checkout.com in a public statement reviewed for the crypto.news report.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  20. [20]

    Checkout.com provides merchants with fraud-scoring, transaction-filtering and authentication tools, while its current service terms state that merchants remain responsible for deciding whether transactions are accepted or canceled.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  21. [21]

    An earlier report from The Information described prediction-market operators, including Polymarket, strengthening card-fraud controls after criminals used stolen payment credentials and fake identities to create accounts, and said Visa pushed payment processors to tighten screening as disputed transactions increased.

    Reported Supported Source: The InformationView cited source
  22. [22]

    A rejection rate above 80% is about eighty times the roughly 1% industry level the Journal cited.

    Derived Supported
  23. [23]

    If more than 80% of deposits were rejected, fewer than 20% were approved, so at least four deposits were blocked for every one that funded an account.

    Derived Supported

Sources

5 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. crowdfundinsider.com

    1 article · September 21, 2026

    Polymarket Hit by $10M Stolen-Card Scheme while CEO Prioritized Expansion Over Compliance Measures
  2. crypto.news

    1 article · September 20, 2026

    Polymarket hit by alleged $10M stolen-card fraud
  3. cryptobriefing.com

    2 articles · September 21, 2026

    Polymarket CEO reportedly told staff to prioritize growth over compliance amid massive fraud probe
  4. cryptopolitan.com

    1 article · September 20, 2026

    Polymarket’s $10 million fraud scare tests whether growth outran compliance
  5. pymnts.com

    2 articles · September 20, 2026

    Polymarket Accused of Ignoring Fraud in Pursuit of Growth

Topics and entities