Skip to content

Invest Widely confirmed7 publishers 3 min read Published Updated

SEC's token on-ramp: a $5M starter round, a $75M tier, and the end of state review

Regulation Crypto Assets borrows the JOBS Act structure for digital assets and preempts state registration, including on secondary trades. The preemption is the part that changes deal papering.

The Investor · Invest desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • The SEC kicked off rulemaking Tuesday on proposed rules dubbed "Regulation Crypto Assets," including two exemptions that would allow certain crypto companies to raise capital without going through the traditional securities registration process.
  • The first exemption would permit a one-time offering of up to $5 million over four years; the second would allow companies to raise up to $75 million in any 12-month period, with issuers subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Both would require issuers to provide disclosures to investors.
  • The proposed rules would prevent states from imposing separate securities registration requirements on certain crypto offerings that qualify for the federal exemptions.
  • The exemptions align with the current Reg CF and Reg A+ exemptions created under the JOBS Act of 2012, which support online capital formation alongside Reg D 506c.
  • The "startup exemption" would be a one-time, non-exclusive exemption from Securities Act registration requirements allowing a funding round of covered investment contracts of up to $5 million.

Why it matters

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," two exemptions that would let certain crypto companies raise capital without full securities registration: a one-time offering of up to $5 million over four years, or up to $75 million in any 12-month period with ongoing reporting attached [4][1]. The same proposal would stop states from imposing separate securities registration and qualification requirements on offerings that qualify federally, and that preemption reaches secondary transactions too [2][5].

The architecture is borrowed rather than invented. The exemptions are positioned alongside Reg CF and Reg A+, the online capital formation rules created by the JOBS Act of 2012 [15]. The smaller one, described as a "startup exemption," is a one-time, non-exclusive exemption from Securities Act registration for a round of covered investment contracts up to $5 million [3]. The larger Fundraising Exemption has two tiers: up to $20 million of covered investment contracts in 12 months under Tier 1, and up to $75 million under Tier 2, which requires filed offering documents, audited financial statements and periodic reporting [16]. Both exemptions require principles-based disclosure, and federal antifraud and antimanipulation rules would still apply [8][9].

The numbers set the incentive. Spread across its four-year window, the startup exemption averages $1.25 million a year, so the $75 million annual ceiling is 60 times that pace [20]. The $55 million of headroom between Tier 1 and Tier 2 is, in effect, the price the SEC is putting on audited financials and periodic reporting [21]. Counsel will be modelling whether a client can live inside Tier 1 and skip the audit, or needs the full apparatus.

Two provisions matter more than the caps. The first is a conditional safe harbor that would let an issuer "delink" a crypto asset from the investment contract through which it was sold [6]. Chair Paul Atkins said that safe harbor becomes available once an issuer has completed or permanently ceased all essential managerial efforts it represented or promised it would take under the contract [7]. The second is the preemption mechanism: the rules would define "qualified purchaser," and state registration and qualification requirements would be preempted for offers and sales of covered investment contracts, secondary transactions included [5]. States would keep fraud authority [18]. They have lost this fight before, having sued the SEC over Reg A+ and lost in court [18].

The path here was not smooth. The SEC canceled a meeting on Regulation Crypto Assets last week, citing an "unforeseen scheduling issue" [13]. Crypto In America reported on Monday that SIFMA, the Wall Street trade group, had discussed a potential legal challenge to the SEC's authority, and that the White House had asked the agency to postpone the meeting amid CLARITY Act negotiations [14]. Atkins said the Commission continues to support congressional work on the CLARITY Act and expects the bill to reach the president's desk, but that "under our current statutory authority, we are acting" [10]. A setback in negotiations sank hopes of passage this year [11].

Commissioner Hester Peirce said the proposed exemptions would not cover every type of crypto project and asked the industry to weigh in on how the rules should evolve, calling the proposal "one step on a long road" [17].

The comment period runs 60 days from publication in the Federal Register [12]. Watch whether SIFMA's threatened challenge materialises, and note that Treasury moved on Monday to implement the GENIUS Act, generally requiring stablecoin issuers to hold federal or state licenses from January 2027, with platform restrictions on unapproved issuers' stablecoins from July 2028 [19].

Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence78
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+25
Incentives60
Confidence72

Perspective Coverage

7 publishers
Builder
Builder 29%
Operator
Operator 35%
Investor
Investor 36%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The first exemption would permit a one-time offering of up to $5 million over four years; the second would allow companies to raise up to $75 million in any 12-month period, with issuers subject to ongoing reporting requirements. Both would require issuers to provide disclosures to investors.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    The proposed rules would prevent states from imposing separate securities registration requirements on certain crypto offerings that qualify for the federal exemptions.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    The "startup exemption" would be a one-time, non-exclusive exemption from Securities Act registration requirements allowing a funding round of covered investment contracts of up to $5 million.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  4. [4]

    The SEC kicked off rulemaking Tuesday on proposed rules dubbed "Regulation Crypto Assets," including two exemptions that would allow certain crypto companies to raise capital without going through the traditional securities registration process.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  5. [5]

    The proposed rules would define "qualified purchaser," under which state securities law registration and qualification requirements would be preempted for offers and sales of covered investment contracts, including secondary transactions.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  6. [6]

    The proposal includes a conditional safe harbor allowing an issuer to "delink" a crypto asset from the investment contract through which it was sold, if the issuer meets the SEC's conditions.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  7. [7]

    Atkins stated the proposal "would also allow for a safe harbor once an issuer has completed or permanently ceased all essential managerial efforts that it represented or promised it would take under an investment contract."

    Reported Supported Source: SEC Chairman Paul AtkinsView cited source
  8. [8]

    For both exemptions an issuer would be required to make principles-based disclosures; for the $75 million exemption, issuers would need to file financial statements alongside ongoing reporting.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  9. [9]

    Both exemptions would require disclosures, while federal antifraud and antimanipulation rules would still apply.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  10. [10]

    Atkins said: "The SEC continues to support congressional work on the CLARITY Act, and we expect to see the bill reach the president's desk. Under our current statutory authority, we are acting. The work before us is too important."

    Reported Supported Source: SEC Chair Paul AtkinsView cited source
  11. [11]

    A setback in negotiations over the Clarity Act sank hopes that the market-structure legislation would be passed this year; Atkins had signaled in late July that the Commission was prepared to step in with its own rules if the bill fell short.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  12. [12]

    The public comment period will be open for 60 days after the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  13. [13]

    The proposal comes after the SEC abruptly canceled a meeting on Regulation Crypto Assets last week, citing an "unforeseen scheduling issue."

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  14. [14]

    On Monday, Crypto In America reported that SIFMA, a Wall Street trade group representing broker-dealers, investment banks and asset managers, had discussed a potential legal challenge to the SEC's authority, and that the White House had asked the agency to postpone the meeting amid Clarity Act negotiations.

    Reported Supported Source: Crypto In America, as reported by DecryptView cited source
  15. [15]

    The exemptions align with the current Reg CF and Reg A+ exemptions created under the JOBS Act of 2012, which support online capital formation alongside Reg D 506c.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  16. [16]

    The Fundraising Exemption would include two tiers similar to Reg A: under Tier 1 issuers could offer up to $20 million of covered investment contracts in a 12-month period; under Tier 2 up to $75 million, but they must file offering documents along with audited financial statements and periodic reporting.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  17. [17]

    SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce acknowledged the proposed exemptions would not cover every type of crypto project and called on the industry to provide feedback, writing that "This proposal is one step on a long road toward a clear, sensible, enforceable regulatory framework for crypto."

    Reported Supported Source: SEC Commissioner Hester PeirceView cited source
  18. [18]

    States have continued to voice concerns about diminished authority; states sued the SEC over Reg A+ and eventually lost in court. States can still pursue fraud.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  19. [19]

    On Monday, the U.S. Treasury Department proposed regulations implementing the GENIUS Act that would generally require stablecoin issuers to obtain federal or state licenses beginning in January 2027, with crypto platforms facing restrictions on selling stablecoins from unapproved issuers beginning in July 2028.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  20. [20]

    The $5 million one-time exemption averages $1.25 million per year over its four-year window, and the $75 million annual ceiling is 60 times that annual pace.

    Derived Supported
  21. [21]

    The difference between the Tier 1 cap of $20 million and the Tier 2 cap of $75 million is $55 million, and Tier 2 is the tier that carries audited financial statements and periodic reporting.

    Derived Supported

Sources

7 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. americanbanker.com

    1 article · August 18, 2026

    SEC proposes rules to ease crypto fundraising
  2. bankless.com

    1 article · August 19, 2026

    SEC Proposes "Regulation Crypto Assets" Framework
  3. cointelegraph.com

    1 article · August 19, 2026

    SEC regulatory proposal marks ‘important’ step forward from ‘inapt’ crypto rules: Commissioner Peirce
  4. crowdfundinsider.com

    1 article · August 18, 2026

    Regulation Crypto Assets: SEC Proposes New Rules for Crypto
  5. cryptobriefing.com

    1 article · August 18, 2026

    SEC proposes Regulation Crypto Assets with new capital-raising exemptions
  6. decrypt.co

    2 articles · August 19, 2026

    SEC Proposes Crypto Fundraising Exemptions in Abrupt About-Face
  7. thedailyupside.com

    1 article · August 19, 2026

    What’s Behind the SEC’s New Crypto Proposal?

Topics and entities

Topics