DeepSeek's new encoder-decoder splits inference into an 8B prefill and a 16B decode
V4.1-Flash retires the V4 Pro line and carries two active-parameter counts, 763B total with 8B on input tokens and 16B on output, so one sizing number no longer covers both phases of a request. Baseten had it running on day zero.
The Engineer · Build desk

What happened
- DeepSeek released V4.1-Flash with 763B total parameters, 8B active on input tokens and 16B active on output, a 1M-token context, text and image input, and an MIT license, per Artificial Analysis.
- Latent Space reported that DeepSeek is retiring V4 Pro and going all in on a completely new causal encoder-decoder architecture, released under a point-release version number.
- Artificial Analysis scored the model 40 on its Intelligence Index and said it surpasses DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 while costing much less to run.
- Artificial Analysis listed the price at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output, with cached input at $0.006 and a further 50 percent off-peak discount.
Why it matters
- What it limits constraint Sizing a deployment now takes two active-parameter counts, since decode activates twice what prefill does, and a batching profile tuned to a single figure will mis-size one of the two phases.
- Who has to decide decision Cached input is 50 times cheaper than fresh input, so cache retention policy sets what an agent costs to run.
- What it costs cost Generation-heavy agents pay twice for the same tokens: output is priced at four times input, and it runs the heavier 16B path.
- What doesn't add up contradiction Artificial Analysis places the model below GLM-5.3-Flash while Vals ranks it first among open-weight models ahead of Kimi K3, so the index a team standardizes on decides whether this looks like a frontier buy or a cheap runner-up.
Next story · Invest · Oct 5
Moonshot's last private round values it at about 167 times revenue ahead of a Hong Kong IPOConfirmed3 publishers
Send a request and the two halves of the model bill differently. Input tokens run the 8B active path, and every output token runs the 16B one [1]. To write that down, Latent Space extended the established naming convention for MoEs into 763B-P8B-D16B, because the usual notation carries one active count [2]. A capacity planner that stores one active-parameter count per model is now storing the wrong thing, and decode is twice prefill [10].
Against the 763B total, 8B is about 1.0 percent and 16B about 2.1 percent [20]. Latent Space put the sparsity at 1 to 2 percent [19].
The cache claim is the one to check first if you run long agents. Reading the v4.1 Flash tech report, Latent Space credits tweaks including Sliding-Window Attention Bounded Replay [4]. At an eighth of the footprint, the same memory budget holds eight times as many tokens [14]. The price list points the same way: cached input is 50 times cheaper than fresh input [12], and output is four times input [11]. Off peak, both halve, to $0.15 and $0.60 per million tokens [13].
Vals ran its index at 1M context with a 384-token output cap, temperature 1, default top-p and top-k, and high reasoning effort, and reported $0.30 per test [9][8]. A 384-token cap does not exercise the 16B decode path for long. The per-test figure transfers to workloads whose outputs stop around there; a coding agent that streams a few thousand tokens a turn buys the 16B path many more times per turn.
Latent Space wrote that v4.1 Flash "is technically behind other open models in some benchmarks" [7], and argued the target is "the most creative and efficient use of context we have ever seen openly explained" [16].
On adoption, the recap has one line: Baseten shipped day-0 support and described the model as smarter, faster and more efficient than DeepSeek v4 [15]. The recap does not say what that support cost to build. A new architecture with two active counts and an image input path is more than a weight swap for a serving stack, and Baseten going live on day zero is the only measure of that work here. The model is MIT licensed and served first-party by DeepSeek in the US, according to Artificial Analysis [17].
What to watch
- A per-phase memory breakdown from DeepSeek would let operators size prefill and decode hosts without measuring them first.
- Whether serving stacks beyond Baseten ship the encoder-decoder path, and what they report having to change for it.
- A Vals rerun with an output cap above 384 tokens would show what the 16B decode path costs per test in practice.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence60
- Adoption35
- Hype gap+25
- Incentives40
- Confidence58
Perspective Coverage
3 publishers- Builder
- Builder 40%
- Operator
- Operator 28%
- Investor
- Investor 32%
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Latent Space describes the release as a novel causal encoder-decoder architecture with vision, with prefill/decode separation: 8B in prefill (input tokens) and 16B in decode (output tokens).
- [2]
Latent Space says the notation "DeepSeek v4.1-Flash: 763B-P8B-D16B" comes from extending the established notation for MoEs.
- [3]
DeepSeek launched V4.1-Flash as a new open-weight flagship focused on extreme inference efficiency and low cost.
- [4]
Latent Space, citing the DeepSeek v4.1 Flash tech report, says new tweaks including Sliding-Window Attention Bounded Replay make for a KV cache footprint up to 1/8 that of V4 Flash, which makes it better, faster and cheaper for long running agents.
- [5]
Artificial Analysis reported that DeepSeek V4.1 Flash surpasses DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 despite being much cheaper, scoring 40 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, just below GLM-5.3-Flash and above the latest V4 Pro.
- [6]
Artificial Analysis reported pricing of $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $1.20 per 1M output tokens, with cached input at $0.006 per 1M and an additional 50 percent off-peak discount.
- [7]
Latent Space wrote: "v4.1 Flash is technically behind other open models in some benchmarks."
- [8]
Vals called DeepSeek V4.1-Flash the new number one open-weight model on the Vals Index, ahead of Kimi K3, at just $0.30 per test, the cheapest model in the open-weight top 10.
- [9]
Vals said its eval ran with 1M context, 384 max output tokens, temperature 1, default top-p/top-k, and high reasoning effort.
- [10]
The decode path activates twice as many parameters as the prefill path.
- [11]
Output tokens are priced at four times input tokens.
- [12]
Cached input is 50 times cheaper than fresh input.
- [13]
With the additional 50 percent off-peak discount, input works out to $0.15 per 1M tokens and output to $0.60 per 1M tokens.
- [14]
A KV cache footprint one eighth the size holds about eight times as many cached tokens in the same memory budget.
- [15]
Baseten shipped day-0 support and summarized the product positioning as smarter, faster, and more efficient than DeepSeek v4.
- [16]
Latent Space wrote that what DeepSeek's v4.1 and broader research agenda is aiming for is "the most creative and efficient use of context we have ever seen openly explained".
- [17]
Artificial Analysis describes DeepSeek V4.1-Flash as a 763B total-parameter model with 8B active input and 16B active output parameters, 1M-token context, text and image input, MIT license, and US/API availability via DeepSeek first party.
- [18]
Latent Space reported that DeepSeek is doing a completely new architecture, retiring V4 Pro and going all in on the new model, while only titling it v4.1 Flash.
- [19]
Latent Space puts the model's sparsity at 1-2 percent.
- [20]
8B active is about 1.0 percent of the 763B total and 16B active is about 2.1 percent.
Sources
3 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.
- businesstimes.com.sgDeepSeek's low-cost model deals fresh blow to rivals OpenAI, Z.AI; hits memory makers - The Business Times
1 article · September 12, 2026
- dev.toทำไม KV cache ถึงกลายเป็นหัวใจเศรษฐศาสตร์ของ AI agent ในปี 2026
2 articles · September 14, 2026
- latent.space[AINews] DeepSeek v4.1-Flash: 763B-P8B-D16B novel causal Encoder–Decoder architecture with vision marks the Return of the Whale
1 article · September 11, 2026