Skip to content

Invest Reports disagree10 publishers 3 min read Published

Oracle's force majeure notice on Jupiter tests who pays when AI campuses run late

Oracle issued a force majeure notice on Blue Owl's Jupiter campus, whose reported $18bn of bank loans already trade below 90 cents on the dollar. Lenders who priced Oracle's credit now also have to price who pays when the power arrives late.

The Investor · Invest desk

Send a correction

What happened

  • A person familiar with the notice and the deal told Reuters the Jupiter program is being delayed by a year.
  • Invoking force majeure lets Oracle pay the lower development-stage rent for longer, while Blue Owl still gets the higher rent for its full original term, starting later.
  • Oracle and Blue Owl shares each fell about 4%, and Bloom Energy, chosen to supply fuel cells for the 2.45-gigawatt campus, dropped 6%.
  • A person close to SB Energy's financing said the Oracle event is running through talks on its Ohio campus for OpenAI, and SB Energy decided this week to delay its IPO.

Why it matters

  • Who's exposed exposure Banks behind Jupiter now depend on how a force majeure clause is read, in addition to Oracle's credit and OpenAI's appetite for the capacity.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction Oracle's on-schedule statement and a source's one-year delay cannot both be right, so anyone bidding for the loans has to choose which account to price.
  • What it sets up precedent With force majeure clauses spreading through development agreements, a highly rated tenant like Oracle no longer settles the financing question for the next campus on its own.

According to the person who described the contract to Reuters, securing power for the site is Oracle's own responsibility [5]. Power is also the reason the notice gives for possible delays [2]. Force majeure is for events beyond a party's control [20]. Invoking it over a task Oracle signed up for is an awkward argument, and Bloomberg reported that it is not certain the notice would free Oracle from financial obligations it had already agreed to [11].

Start with the equity. Blue Owl's roughly $3 billion earns a 9% yield during construction and about 11% levered once the campus is finished [3][12]. A year at the lower rate pays about $270 million where $330 million was expected, a gap of roughly $60 million [24]. Blue Owl said the notice does not change the financial commitments to the project [4].

The lenders are the harder case. The reported bank debt is six times Blue Owl's equity [23]. Oracle cannot terminate the lease and pays the debt costs, the same Reuters source said [7], so the loans ought to trade on Oracle's credit, or rather on Oracle's credit minus whatever room the notice gives it to defer what it owes. They trade below 90 cents on the dollar, according to a person Bloomberg spoke to [8]. At that price, the full $18 billion would show more than $1.8 billion of paper losses across the consortium [21]. Some of that discount has nothing to do with the clause: the campus has also faced delays to a planned natural-gas pipeline and legal challenges over water and air-quality permits [9].

If Oracle's statement that "Project Jupiter remains on our planned schedule" holds [26], the notice was a precaution and the loans should climb back toward par. A real one-year delay, with Blue Owl taking the lower yield and Oracle still servicing the debt, would leave the banks with a price loss for a cost that fell on the equity. The worst case for lenders is Oracle arguing that its payments can wait until the campus comes online, and the banks learning in a dispute what the clause is worth. I think the middle case is the likeliest, because Oracle is staying on as main tenant and is trying only to put off payments [10].

The SB Energy connection rests on one person close to its financing [15], and the reporting does not say the notice caused the IPO delay. The contract point has wider support. Lawyers told Reuters that force majeure provisions are becoming more common in data center development agreements [16]. "The financing side of the AI buildout is starting to ask much harder questions than the demand side," said Sean McDevitt, a partner at Arthur D. Little [17]. "The underlying demand still appears very strong, but investors and lenders are increasingly focused on how risk is allocated," he said [18].

Moody's projects AI-related capital spending by the six biggest US technology companies at around $1 trillion in 2027, and lenders are asking whether markets can take that volume of issuance without wider pricing or tighter terms [22]. The contract-risk thesis fails if Jupiter's loans recover toward par while the year's delay stands. A recovery like that would show lenders still treat Oracle's promise to service the debt as intact [8][7].

What to watch

  • Whether Oracle or Blue Owl disclose that Oracle's debt-service payments continue through any force majeure period.
  • SB Energy's revised IPO timetable, and whether the lease terms on its Ohio campus for OpenAI change before it lists.
  • New Mexico rulings on Jupiter's power supply, including the delayed natural-gas pipeline and the water and air-quality permit challenges.

Information, not investment advice. This story is general information about companies and markets, drawn from cited reporting. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security; check the cited sources before acting.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence60
Adoption20
Hype gap+25
Incentives65
Confidence55

Perspective Coverage

12 publishers
Builder
Builder 4%
Operator
Operator 22%
Investor
Investor 74%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Oracle issued a force majeure notice to a Blue Owl unit, STACK Infrastructure, the developer of the Jupiter data center campus in New Mexico being built to support OpenAI.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters, citing interviews with bankers and investorsView cited source
  2. [2]

    Oracle's force majeure notice cited potential delays in securing power for the project.

    Reported Supported Source: A person familiar with the matter, to ReutersView cited source
  3. [3]

    Blue Owl has about $3 billion of equity invested in the Jupiter project.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters sourceView cited source
  4. [4]

    Blue Owl said the notice does not change the financial commitments to the multi-year project.

    Reported Supported Source: Blue Owl statement, per ReutersView cited source
  5. [5]

    Securing power for the site is Oracle's responsibility under the contract.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters sourceView cited source
  6. [6]

    The 1,400-acre Project Jupiter campus secured $18 billion in loans from a consortium of banks, according to media reports.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters, citing media reportsView cited source
  7. [7]

    Oracle cannot terminate the lease under any circumstances, and Oracle is responsible for paying the debt costs.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters sourceView cited source
  8. [8]

    The debt tied to the Jupiter development is trading at stressed levels, below 90 cents on the dollar.

    Reported Supported Source: Person with knowledge of the matter, to BloombergView cited source
  9. [9]

    The campus has reportedly faced infrastructure setbacks including delays to a planned natural-gas pipeline and legal challenges over water and air-quality permits.

    Reported Supported Source: ReutersView cited source
  10. [10]

    Rather than trying to walk away as the site's main tenant, Oracle is attempting to put off payments should Project Jupiter get derailed and fail to come online in 2028 as planned.

    Reported Supported Source: Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the situationView cited source
  11. [11]

    It is not certain that the force majeure maneuver would free Oracle from its previously agreed financial obligations.

    Reported Supported Source: BloombergView cited source
  12. [12]

    During the development stage Blue Owl earns a 9% yield on its equity; upon completion the levered yield is expected to be around 11%.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters sourceView cited source
  13. [13]

    By invoking force majeure, Oracle extends the period during which it pays Blue Owl the lower development-stage rent; Blue Owl will still receive the higher rent for the originally planned duration, but its start will be delayed.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters sourceView cited source
  14. [14]

    Oracle shares fell 4%, Blue Owl shares fell 4% and Bloom Energy shares fell 6%; Oracle partnered with Bloom to power the 2.45-gigawatt campus using solid oxide fuel cells.

    Reported Supported Source: Investing.comView cited source
  15. [15]

    The Oracle event is reverberating through discussions around other proposed data center financings, including SB Energy, which is developing a campus to serve OpenAI in Ohio; SB Energy decided this week to delay its IPO.

    Reported Supported Source: A person close to SB Energy's financing, to ReutersView cited source
  16. [16]

    Lawyers say force majeure provisions are becoming more common in data center development agreements, raising concerns among lenders and investors.

    Reported Supported Source: Lawyers, per ReutersView cited source
  17. [17]

    "The financing side of the AI buildout is starting to ask much harder questions than the demand side,"

    Reported Supported Source: Sean McDevitt, partner at Arthur D. Little, to ReutersView cited source
  18. [18]

    "The underlying demand still appears very strong, but investors and lenders are increasingly focused on how risk is allocated."

    Reported Supported Source: Sean McDevitt, partner at Arthur D. Little, to ReutersView cited source
  19. [19]

    The participation in a deal of highly rated firms such as Oracle isn't necessarily enough to soothe anxious investors.

    Reported Supported Source: Reuters analysisView cited source
  20. [20]

    Companies can use force majeure provisions when events beyond their control make it difficult to meet their contractual obligations.

    Reported Supported Source: ReutersView cited source
  21. [21]

    If the full $18 billion of loans were marked below 90 cents on the dollar, the paper loss would exceed $1.8 billion.

    Derived Supported
  22. [22]

    AI-related capital spending by the six biggest US technology companies is projected to reach around $1 trillion in 2027, according to Moody's, raising concerns among lenders about whether markets can absorb the volume of issuance without wider pricing pressure or tighter terms.

    Reported Supported Source: Moody's projection, per ReutersView cited source
  23. [23]

    The reported $18 billion of bank debt is six times Blue Owl's roughly $3 billion of equity.

    Derived Supported
  24. [24]

    A one-year delay at the development-stage yield pays Blue Owl about $270 million instead of about $330 million on its roughly $3 billion, a gap of roughly $60 million.

    Derived Supported
  25. [25]

    The Jupiter program is being delayed by a year.

    Reported Contested Source: Person familiar with Oracle's notice and the deal, to ReutersView cited source
  26. [26]

    "Project Jupiter remains on our planned schedule,"

    Reported Contested Source: Oracle spokesperson, to BloombergView cited source

Sources

10 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. abqjournal.com

    1 article · September 24, 2026

    Oracle invokes ‘force majeure’ for Project Jupiter data center in Doña Ana County
  2. cnbc.com

    1 article · September 24, 2026

    Oracle shares drop on report it sent 'force majeure' notice about data center project
  3. cryptobriefing.com

    2 articles · September 26, 2026

    Oracle obligated to pay data center investors despite power issues
  4. cryptopolitan.com

    1 article · September 24, 2026

    Oracle force majeure notice on Stargate site rattles AI investors
  5. finance.yahoo.com

    8 articles · September 25, 2026

    Oracle Cites ‘Force Majeure’ to Shield Itself on Controversial Data Center
  6. fool.com

    2 articles · September 24, 2026

    Why Oracle Stock Just Dropped | The Motley Fool
  7. insurancejournal.com

    1 article · September 24, 2026

    Oracle Cites ‘Force Majeure’ on Controversial New Mexico Data Center
  8. morningstar.com

    2 articles · September 24, 2026

    Oracle Stock Slides on Report of Notice Citing 'Force Majeure' to Data-Center Developer | Morningstar
  9. pivotnews.ai

    1 article · September 25, 2026

    Oracle files force majeure notice on its flagship New Mexico AI data center
  10. proactiveinvestors.com

    1 article · September 24, 2026

    Oracle shares fall as company invokes 'force majeure' over New Mexico data center project | NYSE:ORCL, XETRA:ORC
  11. seekingalpha.com

    2 articles · September 27, 2026

    AI Infrastructure Buildout Risks
  12. semafor.com

    2 articles · September 25, 2026

    AI's financial Jenga towers start to wobble

Topics and entities